209 karma · joined April 6, 2023
The difference in "LGB" categories can be explained by the fact that women are an order of magnitude more likely to self-report as bisexual than men.
It's an improvement from a certain baseline, but Visual Studio set a higher bar for me personally.
These immigration statistics make it clear: https://www.statista.com/statistics/443063/number-of-immigra...
This started after Trudeau was re-elected for the second time, but he has been consistent in calling for increased immigration. I guess he expected it to be his last term and decided to go all out. Of course, considering the timing (housing crisis and stagflation) that's a bad look.
The article starts off with the over-cited and misunderstood 1/6 figure, which comes from the WHO's claim that 1/6 of the world suffers from a "significant disability". I couldn't find a breakdown of what the WHO considers a significant disability in the first place, but the CDC in the US lists the following six disability categories in one of its studies: hearing, vision, cognitive, mobility, self-care, and independent living. How many of these are actually relevant in software? I have never once heard calls to make software more accessible to people with cognitive disabilities, and mobility/self-care/independent living categories are simply irrelevant to the overwhelming majority of software use cases. So no, you're not growing your audience by 1/6 by implementing screen-reader support for your website. If your product is growing, you're better off focusing on internationalization (which, technically, is a form of accessibility, but obviously not the subject of the article).
* Do we really need to abbreviate "accessibility" everywhere? It's just nine more characters than "a11y" and - speaking of accessibility - is more readable!
I agree... but I think this is more indicative of a cultural problem than a language design/standard library scoping problem. A compact standard library is more resistant to scope creep. I don't want every language to end up like C++, and I think keeping the scope of the standard library small helps avoid that. On the other hand, popular third-party libraries that provide common functions have too many third-(fourth-?)party dependencies. Keeping dependency trees small should be a priority for such tools, but convenience trumps all right now so it isn't valued as it should be.
If I have to make a recommendation, the Wall Street Journal has been consistently high-quality in my experience.
I actually believe that mainstream media is more balanced nowadays compared to a few years ago. I think that they've caught on to the fact that trust has eroded in recent years and are adjusting. However critics have not yet realized that.
Funny to get flagged by people who don't have anything to say in response by the way. Whenever politics are involved I take it as validation.
The use of terms like mis/dis/mal-information is simply the contemporary mechanism through which propaganda is peddled.