> War, genocide, mass murder, bureaucracy etc... These are only enabled because people are being compensated on something they need to acquire goods and services in a region,
So in a world where all fiat currency is replaced by bitcoin, aren't people still going to be compensated and then acquire goods and services? So how does bitcoin avoid that problem? If arms manufacturers are paid in bitcoin, they are still going to lobby the US government to get involved in wars to increase demand.
If your main critique is capitalism, then I at least understand the specific philosophy you're criticizing. But if that's the case, then I don't see why bitcoin is a necessary part of that solution.
I'm really not understanding how "fiat" is the root evil here. Currency has value because people have trust in it preserving that value and being recognized by others for that value, no?