1,828 karma · joined March 6, 2008
A cookie-cutter interview will ask things that I've been asked by every other shop in town. For instance, I literally recite Fibonacci now. It's a completely useless test because it's over-used. This sort of thing makes a company look cold and - far worse - unimaginative. It's not insulting, it's just a red flag.
The other part of this is having people stand at a whiteboard or work on paper instead of sitting down with them at a computer. Every single thing you listed can be determined by sitting with the candidate at a computer, working with actual code.
None of this bars you from asking about historical quirks of compilers or anything else. If anything, it offers you the chance to have a more relaxed conversation about these things so you can get past the bullshit and see the person that you'll actually be working with.
"OMG this guy is 65 and still codes?". C'mon. There are a lot of older programmers out there. At least the ones who weren't bullied out by management or peer pressure or killed off by the health effects of sitting at your desk for 40 years.
Re: grammar, I think the article (expected "the") is optional in that case, if you read "expectation of privacy" as a singular concept.
http://www.wikisummaries.org/Hardball#Chapter_1:_It.27s_Not_...
I guess I've been spoiled by the grace of the past 10-15 years of technical book buying, but that is insane.
edit: preposition