858 karma · joined April 27, 2019
Lance had a naturally low hematocrit for a road cyclist, which made him respond disproportionately strongly to EPO. He’d have been mediocre off the sauce in a clean field. The end.
It makes an island sound like a start-up - it's a smaller community with fewer resident experts, so all the skills a person brings are potentially valuable.
The press should be allowed to operate, but I'm done with right wing bloggers dignifying the spreading of conspiracy theories as "journalism".
>Oura ring was 96% accurate in detecting sleep compared to polysomnography, 48% accurate in detecting wakefulness, 65% agreement in detecting “light sleep,” 51% agreement in detecting “deep sleep” and 61% agreement in detecting REM
So it's basically wrong with sleep categorization about half the time.
You can fire up GPT, not issue a command, and it'll just idle there until the hardware fails.
Granted that's also the one thing I hope we don't "solve" for.
Visual designers are architects are trained in these aspects of human perception.
> The phenomenon behind this is called creep rupture—the disentanglement of the molecules of plastic over time, at a stress level significantly below the yield strength—yes, below the yield strength—of the plastic.
(You can't just put a screen on your eyeball, you can't focus that close)
Don't just assert it's indisputable, point to your evidence. We had a couple of close contacts in our elementary school class but of the parents I know whose kids got it, transmission was social from the outside the class, and masking and quarantining prevented further outbreaks. I know that's one anecdote, but it's already more evidence than presented to back up the "indisputable" claim.
Does this not just shift the power to people who can manipulate the zeitgeist? I imagine a Tucker Carlson demagogue but with the ability to materially affect machinery with economic and social consequences. Imagine things like publicly shaming and doxing everyone who owns the wrong kind of NFT, or is a stakeholder in the wrong kind of enterprise.
> I’m hopeful that the financial exuberance in crypto markets can attract brilliant minds away from selling people ads to instead build a more equitable and cooperative future.
1) The people I know who are genuinely fighting for equity are not attracted by the promise of riches. The financial exuberance actively attracts the wrong crowd.
2)I'm also interested in addressing inequity, but if one were to seriously try to build systems with equity and cooperation as goals, why would blockchain technology be a good choice knowing what we know in 2022?
1) there are systems in place to stop this happening.
2) there are system in place to investigate if it happens.
3) the systems in 1) are circumvented
4) the systems in 2) are stymied
This means the systems have been corrupted. It means the US military can claim to care about those things but actually acts entirely contra to those stated principles. This is more cynical than not pretending to care.