But research fraud does delay finding treatment. How many hours of wasted time chasing dead ends.
12 karma · joined July 19, 2021
negate :: ((integer() -> integer()) and (true -> false) and (false -> true) and (a -> a) when a: not(integer() or boolean()))
harder to reason about quickly than say this
negate :: (int -> int) & (true -> false) & (false -> true) & (a -> a) when a: ~(int | boolean)
Is there a reason that syntax was chosen? Is it just for showcasing purposes or is that basically just how the language works?
But also from my end, this leaves me pretty unmotivated. I've been working on an mvp to launch my own startup the past month, and today I find out it already exists in your product.