671 karma · joined January 23, 2013
If I comment, I am probably too snarky.
You don’t sound very happy. You sound very, very angry.
“The left” view fetuses as part of the woman’s body or “the left” view fetuses as slaves.
Does DNA somehow make the bad faith “slave” take more palatable?
> all services and products ever created were created by people working in person
This is your opinion of “better” followed by an unsupported claim of where all products and services were ever created.
This is not evidence.
This is not insightful and an obvious aspect of being human.
> In this case, visceral contempt for Musk being against censorship.
This is an emotional opinion without the support of facts. Are you sure you are being rational?
Very nice glass house you have there.
https://www.csoonline.com/article/3165452/hacking-the-2016-e...
Specific examples:
Twelve Russians charged with US 2016 election hack https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-44825345
If you are disputing these facts, there is no chance of honest debate.
You should know that the term, “Democrat party” is usually meant as insult and is used by Republicans:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democrat_Party_(epithet)
I’m sure it was just a typo, but you mentioned being from Canada so I wanted to let you know.
Contrast this with Republicans who continue to deny the 2020 election following the lead of the former president.
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/nov/24/jody-hice/...
You should be more careful of accusing people of falling for fake news when you are having such a hard time distinguishing fact from fiction.
"The inquiry reported that Trump withheld military aid[a] and an invitation to the White House to Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy in order to influence Ukraine to announce an investigation into Trump's political opponent Joe Biden"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_impeachment_of_Donald_Tr...
"Mulvaney added: "Did he also mention to me in the past the corruption related to the DNC server? Absolutely. No question about that. But that's it. And that's why we held up the money."
ABC News' Jonathan Karl immediately followed up and asked Mulvaney to confirm that "the demand for an investigation into the Democrats was part of the reason that he ordered to withhold funding to Ukraine."
Mulvaney replied affirmatively, saying that "the look back to what happened in 2016 certainly was part of the thing that he was worried about in corruption with that nation."
https://www.businessinsider.com/mick-mulvaney-confirms-trump...
Ideological contrarian? Seriously? Grow up.
Thank you
Did you live in this era? I don’t think you know what you are talking about.
This entire exchange would not have happened if you had simply said, Ruby is less popular than it used to be.
“Past its prime” is a derogatory expression that is invalid in this use case.
I can both dislike Disney and believe this move was unconstitutional at the same time.