513 karma · joined February 3, 2014
1. I don’t care
2. It should work better since it aligns with the goal of the site
Wouldn't the transcript or at least a timeline of Apollo 11 be part of the training corpus? So even without the 400 pages in the context window just given the drawing I would assume a prompt like "In the context of Apoll 11, what moment does the drawing refer to?" would yield the same result.
1) it takes a undergrad to make and measure a superconductor but a Nobel laureate to explain it.
2) in theory if you understand the mechanism of something you can improve it. In material science however almost always all you need is a trial and error approach to end up with a good result.
Conclusion: the effect is probably true, the explanation not
edit: typo
>* A tsunami with strong waves and currents is possible.
It probably come down to the decision of one guy at Bosch who ultimately made the decision to go ahead with this, and this sounds like it was the democratic decision of an entire population of a country - who mostly don’t care what Bosch is up to.
Also how large is Raspberry Pi’s share in commercial applications?