sophistroll

This article presupposes that large numbers of lawyers should have an easy time finding work.

Seems backwards. Why are we justifying the cruelty that results from a mindset necessary to witness cruelty? Perhaps the workers won't strike; let's ask the animals.

He is not describing good people. Good people can reason that hurting others is not how to improve mood.

I am doing this. It is difficult. And it makes restaurants suck.

And let's be real, SF, Portland, etc might one day reach 50% humane meat... maybe. What's the plan for telling the "average" American that a dozen eggs cost $12? And some of them are weird colors?

Ridiculous. Are you implying I have the same legislative power as the agriculture lobbies?

Sounds more like you are defending hypocrites/unprincipled people. By your argument, it's more ok for me to hurt you (from whom I am distanced by the fact that we have never met) than my girlfriend.

It's a question of rights, not convenience or qualifications.

For many, the concept "boycott meat" is even more ridiculous than the concept "animal rights". We have a very long way to go.

I don't think text files should have the same rights as animals. Yet.

Surprising that nobody has mentioned this, but Vim is free and Sublime is not.