Under voltage fault injection - "In general, single instruction skips are easily achievable, though skips of multiple nearby instructions are more difficult to induce and control."
https://research.nccgroup.com/2021/07/07/an-introduction-to-...
5,773 karma · joined September 12, 2011
Under voltage fault injection - "In general, single instruction skips are easily achievable, though skips of multiple nearby instructions are more difficult to induce and control."
https://research.nccgroup.com/2021/07/07/an-introduction-to-...
But did you want a microcode vulnerability? That'd make for another one of these awesome HN discussions...
Downthread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31745105
Try this command:
ps axo pid,ppid,comm | less
The kernel-created processes will all have "kthreadd" as their Parent Process ID (PPID). Typically init and kthreadd are the only processes with a PPID of 0.https://www.quora.com/What-is-kswapd0-in-Linux-Kernel
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9154042/where-can-i-find...
Here's some official documentation on it:
https://tldp.org/HOWTO/From-PowerUp-To-Bash-Prompt-HOWTO-8.h...
1. Breathless nonsense
2. Back story of authors
3. The uphill climb making them seem like underdogs
4. Finally state the few sentences of actual news
5. Describe the impact on the community, which amounts to repeating the lede
(You get the idea.)
I am curious though what the frame of reference is for someone who cheats on the assignment where they promise not to cheat.
Perhaps there are people who make it through life with a sense of learned helplessness or even possibly a cultural mandate - basically, something that represents a higher authority to that person than the Western standard of justice, ethics and fairness.
I'm fully in favor of true justice, shared ethics and fair and compassionate treatment - that's a conversation for another time.
If that's not reality for that person, then to have a teacher attempt to engage with them seems more likely to have an impact on their success in a Western society. I'd guess that failing them and possibly expelling them would not.
I'm curious what you think?
Can you clarify your statement? Maybe I missed what you meant.
"We, the armchair internet, have come to shout at you, innovative dude, that your ideas are worthless and that your interesting product is just fodder for patent trolls," ignores a few minor things -
• The video codec industry is absolutely crawling with overlapping patents enforced by shell companies whose only purpose is to extract license fees from every screen that ever existed. The USPTO seems to not care.
• This video codec was produced cleanly, and does not appear to overlap with any of the existing codecs.
I'd say give this smart person some credit.
The Fed wants to maintain a balanced, non-partisan position, as much as possible.
I doubt Chrome will stop using Skia, though Google can always do something akin to a fork or name-change that will break all existing apps.
Highly doubtful that will happen.
And, of course, the counterstrategy is to wait until next Wednesday, when the price of TSLA moves upward, then sell and catch the falling knife when other institutional buyers ease off the stock price.
To be clear, I hold no shares of TSLA because you can get hurt trying to catch falling knives.
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/21/technology/twitter-securi...
If the industry makes mistakes, that's not news.
I think it's worth giving a mention of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_talker as well. (The Allies were not sure if their encryption was secure, and attempted to find other means of securing their comms.)
The tweets refer to Tile-Based Deferred Rendering (TBDR) [1] as compared to Tile-Based Immediate Rendering (TBIR).
Here's another take on it: https://docs.imgtec.com/Architecture_Guides/PowerVR_Architec...
Note that TBIR appears to be a term the author just made up to refer to apps that have not be specifically optimized for the Apple M1 Ultra GPU architecture.
[1] https://developer.apple.com/documentation/metal/resource_fun...
Say the device is provisioned in the factory and generates its public-private keypair. The private key never leaves the secure enclave. The public key is intercepted in the factory and replaced by the attacker's public key, which then makes it to Google's servers.
To forestall "but that would require a lot of resources" argument, assume the man-in-the-middle is the Chinese State and the attacker moves their man-in-the-middle operation to China's Great Firewall. As long as the device remains in China, all traffic can be intercepted at the Great Firewall, where certificate requests are man-in-the-middled in bulk.
tl;dr: This new scheme shifts the burden of trust to the factory and Google's servers. I'm sure there are other ways to exploit that channel.
At that time, Apple's system needed to attract developers, so instead of a walled garden, the company did what they could to encourage interoperability.
[1] http://apple1.chez.com/Apple1project/Docs/pdf/AppleI_Manual....
This seems like a fascinating story, would be happy to read more!
[1] https://www.cryptomuseum.com/crypto/philips/px1000/nsa.htm
(The article is completely choked with overlapping autoplaying video ads.)
[1] https://www.raspberrypi.com/news/bullseye-bonus-1-8ghz-raspb...