>be working on a profit center rather than a cost center.
I automate jobs. But my company sells products. Is that profit?
It seems like a cost, but we eliminate head count.
Hmm saying it out loud. We make profit, just not revenue.
157 karma · joined August 25, 2022
I automate jobs. But my company sells products. Is that profit?
It seems like a cost, but we eliminate head count.
Hmm saying it out loud. We make profit, just not revenue.
At least SQL is old enough to get plenty of relevant search results. You can be a copy-paste DJ if you really can't figure it out.
Isn't that obviously what op is asking?
Me and 18k people were let go in 2018. I was contract, so I knew what was going to happen.
I was hired by a different company who was confident in their ability to not fire contractors during recessions. Before 2020 they let go of the contractors.
I wasn't concerned because I had a ton of money + skills. But I'm pretty sure op is going to be dealing with a similar situation to me.
I've read android has some malware that you need to click "allow from web" and manually install.
I have some sensitive stuff on my phone so security is my number 1 reason for getting an Android.
Just keep your head down, the crowd is often wrong.
Or reading a vision statement, watching commercials, etc.... Because that is getting less technical and more feely.
With some exception (Tesla), technical analysis has major limitations. I don't really have time to figure out if a CEO has new back pain and started taking opioids.
There's a reason index funds are so popular. You hold a belief that growth will continue. You basically need that belief anyway when investing in individual companies.
No idea what to do. Wait? Used are the same price as new.
I think my cocktail of degoogled Google products + adblock solutions + being that person who doesn't care about privacy has made Google 'fine'.
I avoid using Google products unless they are FOSS. I'm not going to get screwed by "play music" or similar again.
Out of FAAMG, I think I like Google the best. But that doesn't say much.
I wish whatever tricks Apple used, they could implement at the Post Office and Car Dealerships. I don't even care if I have to undergo exploitive psychology, I just don't want to be miserable with things outside my control.
Of course caffeine is huge, but we had a 10x type programmer who suddenly went full 180 degrees.
Turns out he stopped taking his Adderall.
My company tried to hide it by saying "mental illness". That's still the official message, despite everyone next to him knowing full well what happened.
>Until that guy burns out and crashes
I see this most with new grads. The company knows their enthusiasm and ignorance to red tape and how disposable they are. They use these new grads on the worst jobs, long hours, terrible work experience, or thankless. The new grads do a decent job, but become disenchanted because their hard work wasn't rewarded either professionally with a promotion, or never made an impact on the company.
---
I genuinely don't know what to do with over productive people. They are going to be disappointed. Although I'll take one at my current company, we have a backlog!
Wow that sounds awful.
How did they "handle it gracefully"? You don't seem upset, but I got second hand customer service frustration reading this.
The closest thing I had to this was an xbox360 red ring of death 3 times. I excused it because I wanted to play Xbox games and that was the cost of playing.
No react needed.
You have 0 input with how weapons of war will be used in the future. I can't say I disagree.
I think of the automotive industry.
Big tech will start to diversify, start banks, buy appliance companies, buy suppliers/vertical integration.
I believe that happened to Auto in the 60s and 70s, about 20-30 years after the boom.
If we (irresponsibly) use that timeline, we should expect dark days for the next 20 years. Most innovation will be outside the US. Then comes the 1990s where tech companies will sober up, cut the free food, and become competitive again. By 2010s they will be innovating again.... 40 years from now.
Sorry for the doom prediction, I just saw a pattern.
I even see people defend it "you really think a trillion dollar company is going to be advertising here?"
Yes duh? They are called reputation management companies, and they are contracted for plausible deniability.
I've seen it play out like this- a few well placed top level comments that defend a companies actions. Those are upvoted, anything contrary are downvoted.
You can see this when a thread is massively upvoted to a front page, that's something that a company can't really control. They don't have enough voting power. However inside the thread, people won't spend as much time upvoting and downvoting comments. This is where voting rings make the difference, controlling the narrative in the comments.
The companies with rabid fanbases are those that benefit most. If they can control the narrative, the fans will take the bait and run with it.
Thank God because I see my parents wasting time. At least when I was a kid I had no money and was bored. They have money and education.
I had to pay a premium for a phone with an aux port, but extra features are worth it to me.
Not sure if I want to advance brain science, maybe these companies can be legally held accountable... Or maybe gambling companies will get to the research first and manipulate us.
We have our own in the upper middle class and we are similarly exploited. Luxury cars + a honorable cause is one that comes to mind.
Marketing can target insecurities but it doesn't need to be insecurity based. I just find that most egregious. Advertising "new, better, faster,tech" seems like the opposite end of this.
Maybe I'm young and didn't experience it, but in the 90s you would plan a trip to Vegas and lose a few hundred dollars.
Today I see people doing this from their phone on every random sports game. Further there are constant ads on TV, the Internet, and on billboards.
I'm fortunate for a teacher who says "gambling is a tax on people who can't do math". And having tried gambling, it was a labor intensive way to lose money.
Now that I've seen high performers deviate from their job and make mistakes in the core role, I understand that even good workers benefit from managers.
I can even say the same thing about program management.
If communication is good, you don't need these as much, but big companies lack the ability to communicate effectively.
I basically don't use twitter, but I find myself on the platform in rants about how exploitive and manipulative some people are willing to be.
There is one company that targets vunerable people with their relatively affordable Veblen goods to make them feel socially insecure if they buy an Android instead. It's so obvious when you read about it, but it's masked in edgy advertising.
Reading about a company's marketing strategy is probably not good for my health.
Physicians have a monopoly on treatment and restrict supply through the ACGME.
Hospitals and physicians have spent 1Billion on lobbying.
I could go on, I want a science based healthcare as an alternative to our authority based system.
It would be one thing if our system healed everyone, but the number of mistakes is enough to make me lose faith completely.
I'm amazed at how quickly I can throw together a front end feature in JavaScript on my otherwise html site.
Really all of web impressed me over the desktop/app counterparts. I wrote and read to/from a php database with less than 2 hours of time. Laravel has me doing user authentication + useful coding in less than 40 hours after the tutorial.