1,651 karma · joined August 31, 2010
In a similar way as machines allowed to produce abundance of food with less labor, the voice AI combined with AI translation can make information more accesible for the world. Voice actors wouldn't be able to voice act all the useful information in the world, (especially for the more niche topics and for the smaller languages) because it wouldn't worth to pay them and humans are also slower to than machines. We are not far from almost realtime voice translation from any language to any other one. Sure, we can do it with text-only translation, but voice makes it more accessible for lot of people. ( For example between 5–10% of the world has dislexya. )
But the best so far is Suno.ai ( https://app.suno.ai ) especially with their V3 model they have very impressive results, the fidelity is not studio quality but they're getting very close.
It's very likely based on their TTS model they have released before (Bark), but trained on more data and with higher resolution.
Pause tokens (thinking tokens) are also an interesting method to achieve that and seems to have a positive effect on performance:
It isn't available in most European countries (except for Ukraine and UK) but on the other hand lot of African counties are listed...
"Straight-through estimator. To train our 1-bit model, we employ the straight-through estimator (STE)[BLC13] to approximate the gradient during backpropagation. This method bypasses the nondifferentiable functions, such as the Sign (Eq. 2) and Clip (Eq. 5) functions, during the backward pass. STE allows gradients to flow through the network without being affected by these non-differentiable functions, making it possible to train our quantized model."
also the author's (@shumingma) answer in the comments: https://huggingface.co/papers/2402.17764#65df17ed4d436404cdc...
Huh... "paper" is just storage, the whole point of "computer technology" is to have a tool to do computation not just storage. So no, computers are not just faster paper.
It shouldn't matter if something was written by AI or human if it is high quality , fact-checked. But I think AI (or the way we use it) still needs some improvement for that.
Cyriak: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FavUpD_IjVY
Buttered Side Down: https://www.youtube.com/@ButteredSideDown/videos
And Elevenlabs is saying this about cloning other people's voices:
Can I clone anybody's voice?
Yes, as long as you have their consent. For Professional Voice Cloning, we have integrated robust security measures to make sure you can only clone your own voice. Unless you share it, your voice belongs and is available only to you.
But it looks like it's not enforced if the example in the tweet is possible.
But even if it would be enforced by the company, open-source models are getting close to them and they are harder to control. The public or commercial use of the output from these models can (and probably should) be limited by laws, but if the users want to use it privately (for example to narrate themselves) there is not much you can do to prevent it especially with the progress in this tech it will become more trivial to do it for anybody.
"When guests drop $100 or more just to walk in the door, “people have [the] wrong expectation when they come” he says because those expectations might be unreasonably high."
Acoustic sensors in the car: https://v2minc.com/#solution
Skoda made s sound analyzer mobile app 3 years ago: https://beebom.com/this-ai-app-detects-internal-issues-in-ca...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pruning_(artificial_neural_net...
and, yes the article also mentions that it happens in mammal brains.
Probably they know or measured that immediately showing pop up on a page load gets ignored and closed so they sneaked in the middle of reading, together with the small print dismission text they look pretty UX evil.