If you remember seeing how, you'll get a free virtual cookie.
1,347 karma · joined April 13, 2015
If you remember seeing how, you'll get a free virtual cookie.
You have to turn your head 180 degrees like an owl and have them dead centre in front of the camera side to get them on film.
This one says the audio is improved but I'd have to hear it before splurging again.
I had read that bone-conducting audio is better so I'm a bit disappointed to see that this one doesn't have that.
What you’ve said is nonsensical. Being the victim of some harsh words forgotten the next day while never having to work another day in your life is not any kind of responsibility.
I wonder what vanishingly small is. 0.001% of a million is still thousands.
They lie and treat their employees like garbage.
And their employee technical skill is typically less than a warm body from the street. Less than a dead body from the street.
I still feel sad for the people who lost their jobs. They know who they’re working for though.
And hilariously thinking Microsoft would spin up a critical incident team for a free open-source product. I'm rolling on the floor laughing.
Are they running job ads but not hiring?
The laptops everyone has are COVID-era and about to expire for warranty, and would just be binned anyway. So there is no point taking them back.
Then the people under them who do give a shit, because they depend on those servers, aren’t allowed to register with HP etc for updates, or to apply firmware updates, because “separation of duties”.
Basically, IT is cancer from the head down.
But I decided not to take the article personally because they’re not claiming something universal about outsiders.
I’ve had people attack me like that before and it’s not great. It’s always someone in a position of power, too.
Covers all the main DBMS, explained very simply from the bottom up, maintained constantly and has been read and recommended by people for years and years.
Blaming the victims is not on. Assuming the victims should have done a better job than paid and trained professionals is not on. Assuming the victims are all CS majors is not on.
"Users should know better!" you scream, into a world where currently almost everything stored locally is already safely shuffled to the cloud to be retained even if your desktop dies (Windows 10 OneDrive, and Apple iCloud, and other solutions like Dropbox, Box). Except, obviously, at this university.
Refractor telescopes are extremely expensive to get a good one, otherwise the image quality is awful, and either way they are so limited in aperture and weight that you'll be able to see very little through them.
Don't buy anything off Facebook saying they've used some computer technology to make an amazing telescope. Yes computer technology helps some scientific applications but consumer wise it's all BS.
Reflector telescopes can be okay in theory and can be a good middle ground between the price/aperture of dobsonians and pricier options (my first scope was a reflector so I have a special place in my heart for the image they provide!) But you may as well save your money and get the dobsonian instead, because if you wanted to use a reflector for computer tracking and astrophotography you'll spend so much money on the mount and cameras and add ons that you may as well have bought the pricier option in the first place.
Don't get a fork mounted Celestron CPC. It's the same issue; more expensive, not as good as a dobsonian, you get computer tracking but can't use it for astrophotography.
That just leaves schmidt–cassegrain telescopes. If you want to do imaging you may as well jump here and try to buy a package that has it all including a really really good mount. The only downsides are that you'll be spending $10k-$20k. If you weren't interested in those things... may as well get a dobsonian.
One thing I wanted to mention that everything bar the dobsonian is going to be extremely heavy. For the reflector and Schmidt's you'll be carting a 25kg mount, 25kg of weights, then trying to hoist a 25kg scope onto the mount with one hand and slot it into a tiny rail in the dark while your other hand fumbles for a tiny screw clamp that holds it in place. There's a reason people get into the hobby and then give up.
A dobsonian you basically lift the tube and plop it anywhere onto the base and you're good to go. So unless you're fit, don't bother even getting started with anything except the dobsonian.
As dobsonians are cheap, they're easy to buy and sell, and so if you don't hang around in the hobby then you'll be able to exit quietly and not feel much of a loss. If you do become an enthusiast and jump to the top end there's no loss either, because it'll be such a nightmare to set up, you'll still be using the much larger and better dobsonian for all of your normal viewing.
If you type quickly, it can lose the case of the characters in combination with the shift key.
Hold down the left shift and type CSMSDC. One of them will be lowercase (from memory it's the S). If it doesn't happen for you, either it's not a Sculpt, or you don't type fast enough. Once you can do it it'll happen every time.
The author is pedantic and seems to just not want to use other tools. That’s fine. But this is a dumb road for others to follow.
Remember the entire thing started because they don’t like front matter. They could literally have written a script to parse front matter, which are literally a few plain text lines.
Then they wanted asciidoc but without the dependency. Except their own code will likely have an asciidoc dependency unless they wrote their own entire asciidoc parser. In which case they could also have done this and plugged it into the same script.
“You don’t want to get stuck into the thinking of others,” they scream into the wires, followed by hobbling themselves into the most minimal viable product straight jacket imaginable.
Fool programmers and their time are soon parted.