We looked at the choices, and made ours. Don't tell me it was the wrong choice, without knowing literally anything about me or my wife. That's pretty patronizing.
398 karma · joined March 29, 2007
We looked at the choices, and made ours. Don't tell me it was the wrong choice, without knowing literally anything about me or my wife. That's pretty patronizing.
If the stock truly is wiped out and common shareholders equity is 0, you can exercise the put, receive 100x the strike value per contract, and deliver nothing.
Source: https://www.optionseducation.org/referencelibrary/faq/splits...
I don't know if this was your intention but it's kind of a pet peeve of mine when someone posts "that's useless" to a content creator without elaborating on how they would've approached the issue.
Yes...the average retail customer submitting a market order will generally get a better fill with PFOF. This is what most people don't usually mention when talking about those terrible high-frequency trading firms.
E.g. if a stock is trading at 10.00x10.10 and I submit a market buy via Robinhood. Citadel or someone else is going to pick that up and sell it to me for, probably, 10.08 or 10.09. Not the 10.10 I would've paid on the open market hitting the offer. It's in fact illegal for me to get a worse (higher) fill than 10.10.
That's a pretty insulting statement for those of us who can't have / don't want children.
It's not a competition. We've chosen different paths than you. Not worse, just different.
How is that buy vs rent? Sounds like just house vs apartment?
"Is becoming a racist the best solution, so I'm able to function more effectively?" I can't tell if you're being tongue-in-cheek here or have genuine social issues. My (admittedly somewhat harsh) advice is to close your IDE and go interact - in person - with other humans.
Well I mean it's implemented that way (buying long-term futures) but it's really just locking in a set price. Oil prices skyrocketing doesn't make them infinite money, because they have to either take contract delivery at the price they originally bought at, or use their futures profits to buy at the spot market. In the same way, falling oil prices doesn't cost them huge amounts of money, they just won't be able to take advantage of the fall in prices like a non-hedged carrier would.
I assume they try their very best to hedge to actual predicted usage and not try to profit from swings either way. If they could do that they'd be better off running a hedge fund.
But induction is more like learning about the world by observing it, and making probable guesses. So it may be correct for a machine to observe that if one swan is white, the best guess for the color of another swan (in the absence of other info) is white.