101 karma · joined October 1, 2009
there's a lot of noise on the page considering all I want to see are the names and they only occupy about 1/16th of the screen currently. would be more easily consumable if you grouped by bigrams and had each row devoted to a given leading bigram.
al
hi fi ...
alhico alfiof
alhiea alfiou
...
be...
if i click on a name, then show the affiliate links.. otherwise they're just wasting space.
given that all the domains you're displaying are the same length, you have a nice constraint to work with in the design and could really use space well.
In my experience, the onboarding experience sucked and it crashed every time I used it until I installed it.
"Very cool!! Tons of features. Very fluid. Definitely a step in the right direction by Yahoo!"
Sounds like someone from PR wrote that.
fixie.init([".array", "#of .selectors", ".that", ".should", "#be .populated .with .lorem"])
or just a string like fixie.init(".string, #of .comma .separated .selectors, .that, .should, #be .populated .with .lorem")
I think that would address the class proliferation issue and still be explicit about which dom nodes should be populated. easier to maintain / comment out." Lo-Dash's performance is gained by avoiding native methods, instead opting for simplified non-ES5 compliant methods optimized for common usage, and by leveraging function compilation to reduce the number of overall function calls. "
also, any chance of contributing the improvements back to underscore or is this different enough that that's not a possibility?
"<power user> has gripes" => "<site> is dead".
you're either following the wrong topics, people, or just don't have a sense of humor (that bread question was funny as fuck)
there's still tons of high quality content on quora
i.e.
- http://www.quora.com/What-are-some-best-architecture-practic...
- http://www.quora.com/Jeremy-Lin-1/Whats-it-like-to-play-on-t...
- http://www.quora.com/Design/Is-there-a-science-to-picking-th...
ETC. ETC. ETC.
so it should probably just be open on github.
just throw express or restify in front of mongodb with some minimal scaffolding and generators. if i get a minute i'll try to get something like that up
Things I've noticed so far that I don't like: get/set proliferation, semicolons, braces, positional args, var for instance vars, int/num dinostyle pseudo-primitives.
It seems like they tried to do some cool things, but failed in execution. Like "Greeter.withPrefix(this.prefix);" one-line constructor definition .. where this.prefix is a "shortcut that assigns the parameter's value to the instance variable prefix". Eliminate needless code.. but instead of using a dedicated symbol to call attention to the sugar, they used "this." WTF.. did they specifically want to kill scanability.
Things I've noticed so far that I like: using "_" as a prefix to enforce encapsulation.
Enforcing naming conventions as syntax seems at least somewhat python inspired in the sense of bringing the whitespace is significant design to naming is significant.. wish there had been more of that.
If someone other than Google were doing this it would be dead in the water already.
your name being 4 letters makes that less useful than it would be otherwise.
So D) is probably your best bet for the reason pavpanchekha and Joakal already suggested: if you're successful you can buy the original domain name you wanted like dropbox, mint, facebook, twitter, etc.
Maybe try getting the same 4 letters twice in a row if that works...
http://pine.fm/LearnToProgram/ (probably not relevant for HN) http://ruby.railstutorial.org/ruby-on-rails-tutorial-book http://devcenter.heroku.com/articles/quickstart