1,142 karma · joined May 24, 2016
I also just want to see the code because i think it's cool
New ways of modeling the same information always excite me. This is fantastic work.
I also couldn't get it to boot in UEFI, had to switch back to legacy bios. The partition manager is also a little confusing, i can't figure out which sizes to use or how to create them, i like debians ui here alot for this.
I stopped after seeing all that.
I'm personally completely ok with the special devices specific unlock code suggested. It's not universal, and requires the government to go through the company first who at some level at least have a stake in me believing my device is secure.
The insentives seem to work and I still have reasonable security.
they hash the data and use that as an index. So by def. That said it's pretty bare and missing _ALOT_
I was totally hoping for some fancy templates and macro tricks to compile time gen all the code for a working hashtable implementation.
Question: "Does this mean that today I can create a new (non existing in the native spec) method, add it in the native object, using it in a certain percentage of websites and force TC39 to change it's future implementation thus essentially hijacking the language evolution process?"
Response: "What that means is that yes, you can create a new nonexistent method, use it in a certain percentage of websites, and actively destroy any proposal trying to add that method name. I hope you don't do that, because that would be pretty sociopathic, but that's absolutely how the process works, and will continue to work for the foreseeable future.
We've made tons of progress with this constraint, and we'll continue to make progress with it."
That does not seem like a sensible constraint for language design. Just say the method name is reserved for goodness sake, you are the ONLY people who get to exercise that power.
Reading the comment by @meri_dian I initially thought "ok she had a non-pc racist friend and supported them. Then by association she was deemed to risky for NYTimes". That by itself is a not "character damning" to her, but you can see how a company would want to distance themselves.
Then i read her actual tweets, where she actually called people slurs. That is not defend-able, and I think she deserves it.
That said, seriously impressive work and I give him props.