stevemk14ebr

This is basically pedantry, they want generative AI and AI search off. If anyone is confused then you should be asking more questions to understand the desires.

This obviously an attempt at being able to say a response came from an anthropic model vs say some other model via a model router. As for me, I will keep using my model router, I don't care to be charged more for a name brand. I don't care about the brand at all, it's a commodity.

So what, the world model failed to model physics. The thing they said it did elsewhere. It's a valid critique

It is true, and it can be true, if people hold other people to account. Accountability is the issue, stop normalizing it, your message normalizes it.

Pareto frontier the Pareto frontier and then with a little Pareto frontier you might get to the Pareto frontier

If you don't know MCP by now that's between you and google

That's for the recipient to decide

Yea but that was a person who actually put in work and had to think about and understand the problem. They didn't just generate something with a magic box.

only reliable way to know how things work is to reverse engineer them

Yes, it already exists and it's called dating apps

Yes. Quite simply yes. It's unethical. And it's a dick move

you sound like a miserable person to be stuck in an office with

Perhaps you just dislike facts then

You're crazy of you think Demis is CEO of alphabet material. He's an accomplished AI researcher, Google does about 10000 other things than AI.

I wouldn't do it, your point is now disproven

You can do volume normalization, it's a thing. Lets not pretend this is some black magic.

I'm sure they'll get right on that for ya bud

An LLM is not thinking, assuming and relating it to thought and universal truths is nonsense.

I wish you'd stay in your lane, his comments were awesome and basically the job

> It’s just a foundation? Please just let me know

We are each responsible for learning ourselves, and we live in a time where that is easier than ever. I find it odd your default position is to assume it is not important.

You want to stop the source, which is that the government and other agencies can purchase surveillance data that would otherwise be disallowed by the 4th amendment. We need to end this 'laundering' of information through third parties, and enforce the constitution by its intent.

As the saying goes, POC or GTFO

I invented faster than light travel, it was obvious, just didn't write a paper yet either :)

Testing on 5GB of data fully resident in ram is a terrible comparison. Things get hard when you're in the hundreds of gigabytes or more.

It's still a big deal, you had to compile ffmpeg yourself before

These results are terrible, false positives and false negatives. Useless

Truly trash blog design

So your extension does a bunch of hooks to spoof edge, but then only works on edge? And edge using Netflix normally already supports 4k. So this does nothing and does not solve the stated problem of chrome and Firefox 4k Netflix streaming.

Am I missing something?

What are you talking about, this all exists

We're very far away from this.

Banning calling out AI slop hardly seems like an improvement