1,740 karma · joined February 19, 2020
Given that the moon lander had a 1Mhz processor and 4kb of ram means we landed on the moon with the compute power of a Vape or USB cable. Wild times indeed.
They were also converting paper records to digital. Asking the data entry person where the data is or how to find paper record xyz in the digital system doesn't seem odd.
No. The Etymology of Hacker in the technical scene started at MIT's Tech Model Railroad Club in the late 1950s/early 1960s, "hack" described clever, intricate solutions, pranks, or experiments with technology.
A hacker is one who made those clever solutions, pranks, and technology experiments. "Hacker News" is trying to take it back from criminal activity.
So don't. It is vibe coding, not math class. As long as it looks like it works then all good.
No it isn't it is well defined. The only people who find it "nebulous" are people who want the benefits without upholding the obligations.
For most it didn't. The non 365 Office came in 3 tiers Student, business, and enterprise. Publisher only came with enterprise.
Build 1000 JSON parsers and tell me if the next one isn't cheaper to develop with "(we'll learn standards, stable, fundamental engineering principles, predicable failure modes, etc.)"
>Software isn't scalable in this way. It's not scalable because it doesn't have hard constraints (like the laws of physics)
Uh, maybe fewer but none is way to far. Get 2 billion integer operations per second out of a 286, the 500 mile email, big data storage, etc. Physical limits are everywhere.
>It's also the same reason why enterprise software sucks.
The reason enterprise software sucks is because the lack of introspection and learning from the garbage that went before.
> the final exam where somehow people got their hands on the hardest question of the exam.
They got the question but not the answer so they had to work it out before the test. They couldn't explain it later?
What is your definition of "everything"? It seems to not include computation on a thing known as a computer.
Did the time it takes trains to accelerate and brake change recently? The time it takes to accelerate and brake should have been considered when placing the signs in the first place.
They have historical data, so they know on average people buy 5 things, and they will have data on what impact on purchasing behavior the changes have. Most likely they will tune for increased volume as people spend more to avoid losing a couple of cents.