2,733 karma · joined April 30, 2011
Oh, and I didn't know about the Vienna model, but Stockholm tried to massively expand housing in the 60s in something called the Million Program, as so many others did. Although that solved the immediate problem, it has been a catastrophy for the cityscape.
Isn't lack of housing sort of a side-effect of the very concept of a city?
We also have a lot of black market labour. The unions have historically had a strong grip, but are under attack by political forces that want to undermine that market with unskilled workers.
And on top of all this I think that people simply always prioritize living expenses above all else. As long as there is less supply than demand, prices are going to rise until some are out-competed.
People will have to pay, either with their time or with their money.
Very hard to get anything meaningful done.
You should not expect the Node.js parser to be simple.
Someone would need to pull something similar with the movie industry.
std::variant is almost it, but it's interface is quite horrendous as of now.
Another interesting thing is that c++ also intermingles dynamic allocation with polymorphism, which can lead to a lot of unnecessary pointer chasing
So they make control panel 2.0, reach 70% coverage, launch, and never move the remaining features into the new version so they can sunset the old one.
But I think our disagreement mainly stems from how we interpreted the parent comment. I thought it was very double, at one hand claiming to show support, at the other hand emphasizing how big of a catastrophy this was.
I just wanted to say that I think it most likely was a completely natural mistake, only exerbarated by the scale of the company, and that while you should take some action to prevent it in the future, you should not spend so much time dwelling on it. Shit happens, it's fine.
I would blame anyone who claimed otherwise or couldn't deal with it while not having a fallback.
If there's already an ordering system in place, directly or indirectly, why not use it?
If you want good guarantees you need determinism.
The problem in my eyes is plateauing. Once a project moves past the first couple of iterations, it rarely interests the original authors enough to make incremental improvements. And since there is no financial incentive to continue, the project usually cools down to eventually be replaced by the following iteration. This means that you rarely get mature software.