201 karma · joined December 1, 2014
Agreed that they do present an opportunity to get a little exercise though, which would be missed in the "everyone stand" world.
I suppose from TFL's point of view, the average time take is exactly what they want to optimise too because it everyone through the system quickest.
Personally, I really like walking and I guess I'd be a bit frustrated at not being able to even if it was for the good of the whole. Or even for me personally (time-wise)
Professional at work: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1qi8ZXUH_wY
Technique explanation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BQM8KKP-3Oo
It's a place where someone without existing distribution can get what they've made in front of people.
The members decide whether it's interesting or not so it can avoid getting buried.
The OP gets lots of cynicism free advice and even offers of hosting and domain names.
Everyone can have a bit of a chat about the tech used to build it.
We all can learn things from the comments and advice given.
Well done HN! :)
They focus on a singular aspect of future technology but due to the limitations of their imagination aren't able to predict other entirely new revolutionary technologies and so default to their current ways of interacting with the new tech.
So for example, they predict the cross-continent visible and audio interaction but use the large unwieldy gramophone style microphone to capture the speech being unable to imagine capturing audio from a tiny electronic device.
In other examples I've seen [1], you see a farmer with his auto-farming machinery but he's using enormous levers to interact with it. And then there's the frequent use cast iron to build some of this "future tech" when of course, not much is made from cast iron these days.
It makes me wonder what things we literally can't imagine about the future now. Or how different technologies that we can imagine could come together to produce entirely new things.
[1] http://publicdomainreview.org/collections/france-in-the-year...
Measurements will usually encourage attention and effort to change in a way that non-measured things are unlikely to.
On that basis, I'd argue that even things that are very difficult to measure quantitatively would benefit if a suitable proxy was found that could be measured.
Of course, you do have to be careful that your proxy is suitable!
This was a trio of rooms which were saturated with either blue, red or green light. On entering each room everything appeared tinted with the colour of the light. However, after 5 minutes the brain had restored the perceived balance to normal. You could entirely forget that you were in a colour saturated room.
When moving to another of the rooms the effect began again but with everything tinted whatever colour the new room was saturated in before gradually adapting back to "normal".
I think this supports my above hypothesis. The brain takes some time to adjust to new light sources and will skew perceived colours for a short time after changing the ambient light source.
[1] http://www.designboom.com/art/carlos-cruz-diez-circumstance-...
I too was looking at this and thinking, "How can anyone say that that dress looks white and gold?" I could only see blue and black.
I went outside to get lunch, came back, got yet another dress picture in my social feed but lo, it was white and gold...!
My immediate assumption was that I had seen a doctored image but having gone back to this post, where I previously could only see blue and black, I could now only see white and gold.
My hypothesis is therefore that the type of light you've recently been experiencing influences how your brain interprets the colours in the dress image.
Going from daylight into artificial fluorescent lighting gives White/Gold. But, after some time under fluorescent lighting it turns Blue/Black. For me this hypothesis is somewhat supported by the fact that now that I've been back inside for 20 minutes the dress is Blue/Black again.
It costs huge amounts to create, file and protect patents and any errors will mean that a patent is worthless once the opposition's lawyers get stuck into it.
Large companies in patent heavy fields all have teams of lawyers filing patents as quickly as they can and then defending them and attacking others as hard as they can. The little guy doesn't stand a chance.
Perhaps a solution could be to have government take the place of a company like Rembrandt so that independent patent filers can get the heft behind them required to support their patent.
The interactive data viz is here: http://www.datapointed.net/visualizations/color/men-women-co...