1,691 karma · joined February 3, 2011
What Google does want is to provide provide clean excellent phones where the advertising budget is reduced and the money saved goes right into the quality of the phones.
Having said all that I've had a few Pixels and what I appreciate most is the low light performance of the cameras. I happen to be fond of this kind of photography and so it really works for me.
What I don't appreciate is having to disable both third party cookies in the Android Chrome browser and location tracking. These are both very creepy data scrappers that Google turns right around and sells to advertisers. No thank you.
Next phone though I'm likely to go with Apple just because they are much more privacy forward that Google. I don't appreciate Apple's walled garden approach and therefore I don't have any other Apple products but a standalone Apple phone will meet my needs.
The hydrofoil while taxiing is kind of cute but it will subject to collisions with dead head logs and weeds and all kinds of obstacles that can be easily seen under the water. While are regular float plane's pontoons have been tried and proven as they naturally just skid over top of anything that's below the surface.
So in short, this craft will face economies barely better than a similarly sized electric float plane (even given the energy savings of ground effect) while having the disadvantages of only low level flight and risks from things under the water from the hydrofoil.