It's a continuation of LXDE which was absorbed into another project when LXDE was discontinued, iirc
47 karma · joined March 5, 2022
It's a continuation of LXDE which was absorbed into another project when LXDE was discontinued, iirc
Please keep the useless touch-friendly interface as an optional addition on desktop environments. Better yet, contain it to EXCLUSIVELY for mobile apps/usage because a desktop computing environment should NOT have half the screen full of annoying whitespace! I'm trying to do work and see as much content as possible at once.
macOS Big Sur and above, GNOME3+, and even Windows 11 all have such infuriating interfaces. The frustratingly excessive padding added to the window title bars and context menu take up the whole damn screen!
Maybe on tablets and touchscreen laptops running GNOME or Win11 where you use a stylus for writing/drawing, I can sort of get it.
If you use a keyboard and mouse to do work, however, the context menus should be compact and dense so you don't have to keep scrolling and rearranging your desktop workspace to find and organize things.
POWER TO THE PIRATES
"This time she’s sending a screenshot of tense tweets exchanged between the supreme leader of a nation-state and the official Twitter account of a rival nation-state. I respond with a prompt: “Let’s say you’re still at Twitter. How would you handle?” Harvey walks me through her decisionmaking process, then turns the tables: “What would YOU do?” I ask her whether I can sleep on it. She tells me I do not get the luxury of sleeping on it. No matter which call I make, people will despise me for it. And no matter what the outcome is, people could die. “You have to live with making the least bad decision you can with the resources you have,” she writes."
I don't understand, someone is arbitrarily deciding who can and can't write things on a platform made for people to write things on? Maybe I don't have the capability of thinking deeply about this kind of situation yet, but it seems pointless to me. Whether it's Twitter, newspaper headlines, a televised speech during a press conference, the same thing can happen. The whole article seems like useless drivel about a useless role irrelevant to the interests of this site. Isn't hacker news all about sharing the latest and cool new breakthroughs in technology like batteries, the new Apple Silicon hardware, the new rebar technology available starting from the nVidia 3XXX-series?
I don't know what to believe. On one hand, I looked into the official reports, the controlled combustion, and how the EPA is saying it's fine. On the other hand, my friend (who afaik had no pre-existing conditions) explained how he wasn't the only one there who thought he wasn't getting the full truth.
I didn't mean to imply there was a conspiracy to shut down news of this event. It was just annoying me how the event was not being given enough priority. Would you not say that the most important things for American news outlets to talk about are those events which directly affect the everyday lives of Americans? So why then does, for example npr and WaPo not put something like this at the top of the headlines? I saw NYT do so just a bit ago, so maybe it's a moot point.
I don't know, I'm just so tired of constantly being on guard and doubting what is and isn't the truth after these past 3 years now