596 karma · joined August 14, 2018
I couldn't find more details in the article. Any idea what those details that couldn't be simulated with digital computers (but could be with the simple robots) might be?
Also, previous discussion about WSJ: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13434938
Can you expand on that? What would be the incentive for the miners then? What happens when all blocks are mined?
Edit: As people had pointed out, that they were asking for chat to integrate it into the email client. Sorry for the confusion.
General: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18336202
Version Control: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21661013
[0]: https://qiskit.org/
Personally I have used Cirq[1] and Qiskit[2] to implement some classic algorithms like Deutsch-Jozsa[3] and Shor's[4] algorithm and I would say the two frameworks are very similar to use for those implementations.
So, it would be interesting to get some insights/opinions from someone who has used multiple frameworks. Is there any clear win/loss of those frameworks?
[0]: https://github.com/qosf/awesome-quantum-software#experimenta...
[1]: https://github.com/quantumlib/Cirq
[2]: https://qiskit.org/
[3]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deutsch%E2%80%93Jozsa_algorith...
+ Amazon didn't build any quantum devices.[0]
+ AWS provides a software stack called Braket. [0]
+ AWS provides classical simulation or access to quantum computers from D-Wave, IonQ, and Rigetti.[0]
+ Many companies (e.g. IBM, Rigetti) have already provided similar software stack/cloud quantum devices. For a more comprehensive listing, please see [1].
[0]: https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/amazon-braket-get-started-w...
[1]: https://qbnets.wordpress.com/2019/11/23/list-of-quantum-clou...