techthroway443

This seems like the most sensible solution and would easily weed out 99% of these fake paid for reviews. Is there a way to filter ratings by verified purchasers?

Why don't they do this by default?

You mean like the Terminator?

I thought people voted for Brexit because they wanted more autonomy and didn't like the free flow of immigrants, but I guess saying people were "scared shitless" does indeed make more sense.

What happens when all houses have alarms?

Brilliant

What is this referring to?

Sad state of affairs when an article about encroaching users privacy is met with such indifference.

Same here. How new is this 'news'?

> I don't see any way to add a search engine not on the list

Then that's a problem with Chrome. Using Safari on iPhone you can set DDG as your default search engine.

Rapidly apply brakes. Seems like the safest possible way to avoid the deer without causing injury to driver + possibly others.

Should we be calling the technology Autopilot? I feel like the name implies more autonomy than it provides inadvertently misleading people.

Nope.

This article is specifically addressing social media accounts. Trying to lump your 'gamer tag' under that section is pretty sleazy.

> I'm guessing you're new here?

> created: 1177 days ago

Pretty simple to check really.

To take disciplinary action against employees who among other things are "'pulling rank' on other players to intimidate them"?

Just got a letter from my supervisor. Had no idea it would 'ruin' my search with perverted garbage. Thanks for that.

So they biggest obstacle is regulation/money and not in the technical challenges of making a 3,500 pound rectangle zip around the air? Ok.

For the uninitiated? What did they do now?

Wow whoever came up with the whole 'in the name of terrorism' is a goddamn genius. Pretty much a free card to get access to anything and everything for the sake of 'security'.

What?

Edit: Why am I getting downvoted? Have you clicked on this page: https://www.thepiratebay.org/top/all

Wtf is the point of acting like TPB is a legit site where the main focus is not to spread copyrighted material? Are you that fucking daft?

Right... and the advertised TOC of their folders is mostly what? 99.999% linux distros I presume?

How is that not considered flagrant lying?

From your link: "For example, a child might tell his or her parent 'I ate every vegetable on my plate', when there were no vegetables on the child's plate to begin with."

Check out the Top100 links to get an idea how the site is used.

I'm failing to see the connection between magnet links to download copyrighted material and searching for an ISBN.

This is stupid. We don't store any patient data thus we are HIPPA compliant?

I think I see your point. So in order for TPB to be considered out of compliance with the DMCA there would have to be a clause in the DMCA where it clearly states that magnet links to copyrighted material are not allowed?

If the metadata in question is used specifically for the purpose of distributing copyrighted material then how should it not be?

This does not sound logical at all. Suppose part of complying with DMCA requirements is to remove the offending material - are you suggesting that by being exempt from having to do so they are complying with the requests?

How is hosting magnet links that let you download copyrighted material not considered hosting infringing content?

This thread is just plain bizarre and probably the lowest quality content I've seen on hacker news. Glad you flagged it.

What seems to be the issue here? If you can get a machine to do something that a human can do then you give that human the opportunity to place his focus, time and attention elsewhere.