tennisflyi

Why would they be? Lol

Being smart isn't needed for leadership

All of tech is co-opted. No worker with a buss, cafeteria, Gesnler-level architecture understands the normal person

Never used the actual internet, eh?

Correct

The new ZIRP environments, ig

> being able to code isn't some sort of superiority thing, it's just one skill of many

Nah, bro. You’re elite level intelligence if you can /s

Come and gone. Gatekeeping has some merits

You seem to think people in tech/leadership are actually smart. Your mistake

Short of the title, yes

It’s not cheaper fabric. It’s “better” - lighter, stronger, recycled

No. It’s ATS and not being able to figure out their no context, secret handshake

Project Farm often shows middle of the road/big box store tools are often pretty average - what the consumer often wants/needs

100% is

Yup. ATS has always been a problem. Even worse with AI

Sounds right. Any one shot anything is cap

This is the new default lay of the land. Get an internship in college and job right out of it or get fucked

You seen the charts on their last release? They obviously don’t check - too rich

Very common hiking technique - section hiking

This is ATS screening out perfectly good candidates

Oh, they automate stuff. Just not their stuff

Why are teams always, always so naive?

I does indeed. Look at “gemba” lmao

Take a gander here, https://www.reddit.com/r/Millennials/comments/1o7fcfc/nobody...

I'm really torn, TBH. Plenty of people do, indeed, get on with F/MAANG/whatever out of college and make that 150. Plenty don't. It's jut bleh

The internet was and is for porn. Not sure why that's hard to understand. Also, men want that content and women are going to make it (and get paid)

I listened to the podcast for this pretty much and then looked for entry level jobs. Zero

I’m with you until the bootcamp - cap

I mean, VCs want stories (or at least hype) - not accolades, i.e., Altman, Neumann. Heck, accolades might hurt you. They want the unfound gem/they're so smart/cerebral...

> With 267 followers, her Instagram account usually had modest reach but the post of her child attracted nearly 7,000 views, 90% from non-followers, half of whom were aged over 44 and 90% of whom were men.

Not uncommon at all. I'd also say her parents are prolly millennials, the supposedly "tech fixer" generation. Next, if their (young women) IG account is a business account they know their metics/audience... You can type in literally any name and an attractive women is going to be the first result on search. Go see who follows their public profile and it'll bear out the quoted metrics above. Finally, this is almost all IG is

Categorically wrong. Graduates exceed jobs/internships (if you pass the ATS gods)