thealistra

The kerning in clickonme in the example screenshot is unfortunate - I would change the font

Exactly - so far seems like a windows vista “are you sure?” Modal. Are we missing something here?

Seems like somebody is not accepting that every successful project will grow and become unwieldy like this. This is all legacy backwards compatibility of all iterated ideas that now you have to support.

The ocr example says it recognizes Chinese, but output ignores it - maybe just AI bug in generated examples

You should be happy that you have such a financially aware IT dept. The machines are truly expensive and after managing a farm of 150 Mac minis at work I can tell why.

It is like 3 days running the EC2 buys you a Mac mini? And you can only rent the machine in day increments

Can’t really see it nicely on mobile

US only it seems?

My point is can you write a json deserializer with this, where allocation of every child is defacto optional, depending on input JSON?

Isn’t this a very restrictive way to write? Hard for me to imagine as never wrote with such annotations so no idea how viable it is for a large codebase to have this constraint.

I understand how this works in general. I had static analyzers at Uni, I know lattice theory and all this - I am just wondering how Xr0 handles it.

What happens if a function allocates not deterministically, like

if (turing_machine_halts(tm)) return malloc(1); else return NULL;

How is this handled?

For the bootstrap c lexer and parser was hand rolling really necessary? Lex and yacc exist for a reason

Bro no one will use a web service and trust it is 100% private. This is an unprovable claim. Maybe it is private now, but you sell this in 5 years and it stops being so.

Maybe a JavaScript ad jailbreaks an iframe and reads this.

There is no beating a locally running program

But most CIs allow flaky tests :)

Isn’t this like argparse from Python for typescript?

Couldn’t they add a ChatGPT like bot that would answer questions about confluence or jira content as first AI feature instead of adding unhelpful chatbots for customer support

Is this a replacement for a huge corpo botnet like access control?

If I am a huge corpo, don’t I want to have another huge corpo provide me the software with a support package to have some asssurance and not go with the open source option?

Not sure if your project solves any issue of a singular dev.

Can you show how it works on the page or readme as a video?

Does it open pager or editor? How does it show the shellcheck issues.

The author declared no competing interests, but I bet they are a certified cat lover and therefore biased

Wrong thread - you’re looking for who’s hiring - this is who wants to be hired

Ah yes finally a technology to tell me that Bit twiddling hacks were reposted 31 times already

I wouldn’t say you’re at fault for delivering. You are at fault of not delivering a concise solution that uses least elements possible and has a nice clean fast-to-read readme, one setup script or docker file or whatever.

And tbh the result is just a solution (ignoring all the issues of is this terminal inspired and is email backend as a service acceptable choice) - looks generic, nothing interesting besides a super long proposal and super long readme to achieve nothing special honestly. Just a solution checking the boxes. Probably one of many. That’s why probably wasn’t selected.

TL;DR

1. Be more concise in messaging and documentation 2. Do something more than just the working solution esp if they mention brownie points for cool stuff in the task description

So much words in the docs. So little explanation of why

literally my first thought - would be a nightmare if the user list leaked with emails or something

And what about the battery usage? Again apple has own coprocessor to parse this in low energy

Control click on symbol name to go to definition for all popular languages

Also former Wikia/Fandom engineer. I won a hackathon with a wiki text validator on page save - the idea was never moved to production because nobody ultimately cared about the wiki part of it for years and years. It was just a cost center. Nice chrome to put around ads.

Would be good to also do plain text benchmarks, not simple regexes. As I assume this might be the best optimized case

Oh is it this time of the year already?

Just a legal question. Can it really be non refundable? Aren’t there markets where regulators would require for you to refund?