theanonymousone

From the top of my head, things Apple said they wouldn't do, but later did:

- Native mobile apps

- Bigger iPhone

- Pen, as you mentioned

- Foldable iPhone

- Now touchscreen laptop

Anything else?

Could be cool to collect a full list. From the top of my head:

- Native mobile apps

- Bigger iPhone

- Pen, as you mentioned

- Foldable iPhone

- Now touchscreen laptop

I'm poor. I want the next Luna.

Wasn't "touchscreen for a laptop" another one of those things that Apple intentionally refused to do? Is this the effect of the new leadership?

So, AA published an updated score yesterday, and a new Google model ranks on top of that updated index today.

What a coincidence it is!

Where is GLM 5.3 Flash?

Mine deals with sentiments of news headlines.

Thanks for the index. I will try to navigate it. For now I cannot even find this respan/span-02 in it :/

Did some ad hoc/small test. Unfortunately not very impressive. At least no on German short text, which is my use case.

No. I will, and I will report here.

I had my first use case recently, and did some very non-systematic benchmarking of models on OpenRouter.

The only one that came close to Jev itself was the one from respan (respan/span-02), which is also open source and cheaper too.

> Two small edits close most of it: compute the loop bounds into locals before the loop,

I always assumed any decent runtime/compiler takes care of such optimisations, and usually leave such things to JDK in my Java code. Is that really not the case?

Thanks for making so many lives easier!

Docker is probably the highest-profile software written in Go. Are you happy with that choice? Would you do it in Rust if it was available at the time, or Zug?

> wrapper around API

aka curl? :-/

Tangential, probably useless, anecdote: DeepSeek 1017 refused to open the page and read it for me, suggesting that we-have-a-problem.com is very likely a scam domain.

It seems there are counterexamples to this: https://news.ycombinator.com/from?site=dumbmatter.com

:/

Oh, really? I didn't know this. Sorry.

Then maybe they can be merged once one gains a comment?

@dang maybe?

> Another day where the Pareto frontier is moved up and to the left!

It actually hasn't, it seems: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50151775

Dupe, dupe, dupe, dupe, and dupe:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50151561

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50151576

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50153196

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50153612

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50153725

[dead] ?

Or Java: https://github.com/konsoletyper/teavm

>it's such a joy to write code in Scala.

Yes, but also a bit of a torture to read code in it..

> In 2015, our employment acceptance rate was 1.6% ...

What does that mean? That 1.6% of their offers were accepted by candidates? If so doesn't seem very high...

Yes, that was my understanding too.

I'm surprised there isn't more talk around their Matrix Multiplication bound: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50001740

Is this of practical use, or just a proof for now?

> Opus, Sonnet, and Haiku ... are widely known words.

You are serious?

In their defence, requirements engineering sounds somehow reactive to me, while "this thing" is kind of proactive, for what it's worth.

Or "proactive engineering"

This reminds me of "on-premise cloud".

It still makes me sad thinking about what a perfect name Copilot is for what it does, and how flawlessly and irrevocably MS destroyed such a brand...