557 karma · joined May 15, 2013
And if you read that and still feel confident that you want a well known url, he links you to the registration process.
https://imgur.com/a/https-ohmaticelectrical-co-uk-scams-OmLx...
(The scammer didn't actually manage to put anything in my clipboard, so I'm not sure what they were hoping I'd run.)
Hell, I've personally mentored people who struggled with git and I could feel their struggle.
I'm not saying that learning git was an insurmountable task for them, but their struggle was not something that I had to go through.
I don't see this anywhere nearly as drastically with other tools.
My apple watch just sits on a shelf. My fitbit I only wear when sleeping. My pebble unfortunately broke, but it also sits on a shelf as I haven't been able to admit to myself that I'd never get around to repairing it.
~/src is a git repo. One script evolved into its own project and became a submodule within ~/src.
For configuration files like ~/.foobar_rc and directories such as ~/.vim/, they again are not directly version controlled but are symlinked into ~/etc which is. I don't see any reason that ~/.foobar_rc couldn't be a hardlink, but it's not in my setup.
I used to maintain a single repository at ~ that included ~/src and ~/etc as submodules, with a build script for setting up links. Always being within a git repository became cumbersome, so I moved the build tools into their respective directories (~/src and ~/etc) and now clone and build each repository manually.
Lastly, since private repos aren't (weren't?) free, those submodule repos are really just branches of the same repo that share no common ancestors.
That the cutoff for prediabetes is close to the median level is a statement that much of the population is actually unhealthy in this regard.
Still, dairy cows do eventually become beef. If you ever see a cut of beef that's normally bone-in but the butcher chose to debone this one, then there's a good chance it was from a dairy cow whose bones were too calcified to saw through.
I'm not sure what's common, but clearly not many programs are dumping large data into my registry.
Citation [1] actually uses the "can and may" verbiage.
Citation [2] refers to the "will" verbiage as "now familiar verbiage" in a footnote, but it doesn't seem to be arguing that that verbiage is prescribed or accurate -- just that it's now familiar. It also incorrectly quotes that verbiage as coming from the original court ruling, so clearly they lost track of where they actually got it from (since it's not there).
I did find a quora answer [3] which gave an origin story for the "can and will" verbiage, but at this point I'm not ready to trust anything written on the topic that doesn't have solid references.
[1] https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/miranda_warning [2] https://web.archive.org/web/20230513064943/https://scholarly... [3] look for Mark Tarte's answer to https://www.quora.com/Why-does-the-Miranda-warning-say-can-a...
There's also nothing special about being arrested that makes it so that anything you say could be used against you in court. It's really a just reminder that your right to remain silent may have value to you.