thethrows

So what are the people who are pulling from internet.org proposing? Are they supplying more open internet? Are they providing access to these people/locations to all websites? Are they doing ANYTHING?

Why is the image loading so poor on this website?

I run => RunKeeper. I'm terrible right now, but working on it. I'm in the shin splints phase.

I started meditating => HeadSpace. This really has the most gains for me. I don't even do it everyday and I feel like I'm looking at myself in a totally different perspective. I've started observing my fears, my emotions, etc.

I do Yoga if I can in down time. => Yoga Studio.

Consistency is key. I don't run much yet, but I'm trying to get up to 3 days a week x 3 miles. Really, the hardest part about ANYTHING is consistency. So even running 1 miles x5 is WAY better than running 5 miles x1 per week.

Either that, or whoever decided got a nice vacation from the TV company.

I went to the website. Signed up for the insider thing. It said "Share <link> with your friends to be top 100,000 to get access". BYE!

Really? Their strategy to starting a business is making a pyramid scheme?

True, we need to be able to reproduce and confirm technically that fasting correctly is good for people. But you cannot simply ignore millenia of anecdotal evidence that people who fast simply are more healthier. I find it odd that it's now considered normal to stuff yourself all the time, when historically before maybe a century ago it was considered totally normal to not eat all the time(involuntarily or otherwise).

It's adding a few extra letters to a printed string and makes it slightly more obscure for attackers. Hardly a security measure, but it would be dumb not to do it. Can we move on and not argue about what a stupid error string should be? This is fucking ridiculous.

Those tools you mention are typically not interprocedural analysis. They use information that is local to the method. The analysis at Coverity is interprocedural and hence much more sophisticated.

And it's dead.

No it doesnt. If the law stated that it was not possible to ask the full price, then it would protect consumers. But now it includes cases where the price is halved, which means I can't get cheap transport.

This whole recycling thing is a joke and really pisses me off.

I used to be big on recycling and composting. When I moved in with my current roommate, he didn't do any of it. He just dumped everything into the closest bin, and dumped the bin in a random colored bin. After many arguments with him, I've come around to his way of thinking.

The calculation he had made was actually a very smart one. He wasn't careless, he was actually being very careful. He calculated that he makes on average $150 an hour. If he wastes about 20 minutes a month or more sorting stuff, he basically is already behind. Even worse, sorting adds so much mental stress that the cost of this actually much higher. Even for my salary range, which is about 1/3rd of my roommates, it is still a waste of time to sort trash.

Here is some dude optimizing his time by not wasting it on recycling and he already has a competitive advantage over me, while here I am struggling to get through some for loops. Why should I regress myself even more?

The system heavily incentivizes not bothering. I wish the world was designed where I could care about the planet, but we as a society have chosen to not reward that.