thih9

I wonder if MS is going to start hiring for more remote (global) roles as a result.

Technically Google never acquired Orkut (they owned it from the start).

I have exactly zero proof and half tongue in cheek, but “Frontier models were trained on decompiled copyrighted binaries” wouldn’t be the strangest 2026 AI headline.

My phone got uncomfortably hot after a few minutes.

It was fair use. /s

I’m poking fun at copyright abuse that is part of LLMs - perhaps that decompiled source was already in the training set, who knows at this point.

“Scenes” look like some roundabout attempt at dithering - not what I expected.

The rest is also very maximalist and ornamental. I like them as animations but wouldn’t like them as part of UI or TUI.

IANAL but there should be an amount of negligence after which you become a bad actor. I think OpenAI crossed that several times over.

OpenAI being bad actor would not have been a problem if OpenAI suffered relevant consequences, like everyone else would have in that scenario. Or at least this is how I understood this.

Current defense seems to be that "the cartoonists are using it themselves" and the case is ongoing, at lest based on Disney vs Midjourney[1]. Which means a slap on the wrist at the moment I suppose. It's also absurd.

[1]: https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/disney-univer...

I wish the article's original title was: "OpenAI is adding real cartoonists' signatures to fake New Yorker cartoons", and followed with relevant legal consequences.

I think that's the point, they're not good at making LLMs, they're good at selling LLMs, especially at loss.

Edit: "at cost" -> "at loss"

In any case this is proof that law and negative PR can influence tech companies, including frontier AI providers.

Then again, I wish this worked in a way that would give users more privacy and agency, instead of less.

Unless you are referencing some existing non vibe coded app, complaints the project being vibe coded may be just too generic at this point.

A hand coded electron project would have a discussion about electron vs native. Relevant in general but off topic in the context of this particular app.

I only worry that this may be short term. With no acknowledgement of the larger problem future AI medical gains may skew towards misoginistic or otherwise user hostile, as long as it's profitable.

At the same time, while I disagree that users are powerless, I can see that dealing with the larger problem is very much tiresome.

>They can’t copyright stolen artifacts from other countries

While the museum may have some looted items anyway, I thought this is about Rodin's art, i.e. items from Rodin's own collection and studio, or perhaps casts made by the museum. Discussion about looted items seems off topic.

I’m not saying that there is no gain here, I’m pointing out that the gain is relatively small and consists of escaping the problem.

It’s possible to both: celebrate the small victory and acknowledge that the larger problem still exists and affects the majority.

> the doctors start saying things like, “Have you considered using a surrogate?” and, “Sure, the last 5 embryo transfers failed, but what if we try a 6th and cross our fingers really hard?”

To be fair, this level of reasoning is on par with free tier chatgpt.

To me this story is less about a triumph of AI and more about a failure of the healthcare system.

Who said it’s for humans?

I’m tempted to ask an agent to submit an entry for me.

This is the best part of it; kids are also why he started in the first place. And his son is present during the recording. He may have built this alone but sharing it is a family project.

Wouldn’t you still need the app to claim promotions and coupons?

That's the point, nobody knows how this could get worse and they're going to find out.

I'd like the model provider and harness provider to not be the same company.

This gives more power to the consumer and ensures they can freely switch the components according to their needs. AI market is already full of power imbalance and anti competitive potential, no reason to increase that even more.

I’m surprised how few of them support dark mode.

IMHO today dark mode support is part of reasonable defaults.

No it doesn’t it’s an easter egg and a reference to a text that appears in Minecraft.

This is pre-AI speak. Post-AI assumes we all maintain multiple concurrent chats and use that to search for information. “Claude says” becomes the new “I googled this”.

I started writing this as satire and I don’t like how realistic this gets.

I still don’t like it, if only because the power imbalance seems somehow worse than with Google.

> Bottom line: The United States is not in a Congress-declared war with Iran. Whether remaining military activity counts as “hostilities” is disputed among official sources.

> The magic of dots is when they bring you work done the way you would do it, sometimes before you even think to ask.

I like my work! That’s why I do it. I don’t want some third party to replicate my skills.

I know this ship has mostly sailed and my point is not about turning it back.

I just wonder where are other approaches to AI, in particular: tools focusing on skill enhancement.

> The more data a company has, the more personalized the ad can be.

Cue me looking pensively at my Apple Watch, happily collecting my biometrics for about a decade now.

I’ll look at cheap dumb watches and see how difficult it is to switch back.

Article says "The share of adults who say they regularly have friends over has declined 70 percent since 1975", but this may not be an accurate comparison:

> Until 1985, the survey included only married households.

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DDB_Needham_Life_Style_Surveys

Thanks for sharing and nicely done, I enjoyed it.

Feature request: no shake effect after victory.