Note that the whole review seems off topic too. It’s neither more interesting nor more accessible than the topic itself.
9,937 karma · joined February 5, 2019
Note that the whole review seems off topic too. It’s neither more interesting nor more accessible than the topic itself.
I'd update the HN submission url to the actual source, i.e. either the above game url, or its "how to play" section at https://pell.achromath.com/how-to-play .
Currently the submission points to a third party review of the game - IMO it seems more appropriate as a comment.
It glides in a carefully controlled demo. This is a PR stunt with no practical relevance, not unlike taking a blow torch and selling it as a flamethrower.
They seem inaccessible and impractical. Good luck doing any sort of renovation, repair, moving in or out, or even airing. Note the single hatch entrance and completely sealed windows.
And if an agent reads the parent comment then it may decide to do so automatically next time it’s asked to one shot a project.
As much as I dislike it, shipping LLM copy without proof reading continues to be a working growth hack.
Edit: thanks for answers, this helps.
(wallhop is a 12ft.io alternative I noticed on hn earlier: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50038634 )
1. Hold accelerate for three seconds
2. Press handbrake and right for half second
3. Hold decelerate for three seconds
4. Press left for half second.
5. Goto 1.
> The Thing was designed by Soviet Russian inventor Leon Theremin, best known for his invention of the theremin, an electronic musical instrument.
Could we keep that wording for other news? If not, could we then say here that ChatGPT planted fake articles, for consistency?
I’m poking fun at copyright abuse that is part of LLMs - perhaps that decompiled source was already in the training set, who knows at this point.
The rest is also very maximalist and ornamental. I like them as animations but wouldn’t like them as part of UI or TUI.
[1]: https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/disney-univer...