3,283 karma · joined April 23, 2013
That's less Mcluhan and more Foucault.
It's also funny how they deny that the original deal with Delta was only a temporary short term deal, but that it was always a longterm deal.
My main reason for not using it is I'm not interested participating in a scheme where I do not own/access the private keys and being able to use them and store them the way I want to.
I'm fine with TOTP and sure, I understand it's not phishing resistant by itself.
Secondary was for bittorent'ing.
The biggest problem with UX developers is they know better than you AND force you into their paradigm. They came on the scene and decided "Choice is Bad" coupled with "Our way or the highway".
I've decided to be frozen in time with MATE (basically gnome 2). I have problems with it, but I've realized I don't want to be hit with surprise! on upgrades.
People have replied it's possible to extract the private key, but it's not clear to me that that's usable (maybe it is I don't know). It's certainly not in line with what passkey devs want people to do and not do, so I'm not interested in "fighting" against the "flow" so to speak.
I'm happy with TOTP, as I can manage and use the codes where I want, under my control.
"For your security, you can't call Google for help to sign into your account. We don’t work with any service that claims to provide account or password support. Do not give out your passwords or verification codes."
for the future: https://support.google.com/accounts/answer/7684753
I'm happy to be wrong if I am able to extract and import the private keys (it's what I do with TOTP now), but my understanding is designers of passkeys explicitly don't want users access to their own privkeys so they can tie them to physical objects. I get that, I don't want that.
So passkeys are not something I'll ever use or useful or convenient to me.
We lost a lot of strong privacy rights we had with landlines when we shifted to cell phones.
We're actually slowly creeping into pre-crime territory. You could have AI searching for possible pre-crime candidates based on unknown identity in the area, disparate pattern to usually movements, etc.
And? That's all? This is why no one wants the gov't. to run things.
Isn't this the point of LLMs? If not it would be deterministic and that's not "new" and/or "exciting".
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/04/utahs-new-law-regulati...
I've tried alternatives, but in the end keeping it simple is what I prefer.
> I see. So you intentionally broke the feature, now you complain about it being broken.
nope. that was a recent thing when they forced gemini on the phone. woke up one day hearing a different voice and then went searching how to disable that. maps has always been borked.