throwaway2439

I work at a military base, I received a background check and everything, not for anything classified, but for a scientific research group stationed on a base. Now, I think I'm afraid to leave the country because I'm not white.

Here I was planning to get global entry, but it's clear it doesn't matter lick.

Alright, let's keep it 100. R's in the congress recently ended rules and passed others in order to obfuscate the debt that will be incurred once they abolish obamacare. Also, as said by someone else, R presidents haven't passed balanced budgets. Despite their rhetoric, do you really think the R's care where federal money is spent? In fact, what you are doing has the possibility to expose them to the American people; what you just described is a threat to them.

This is not a dig at the R's, but all of you have to realize the R's do not care about functioning gov't or reducing spending, they just want to pass tax cuts, cut regulations and direct social spending to certain industries. You must realize that 18F's existence is diametrically opposed to that and despite the Medium post, your existence is in danger.

I realize you probably can't comment on this, but there is no way I can imagine all of you don't realize it. A man can only take so much fluffy talk when the truth is right in front of his eyes.

PS When I say all of you, I am directing it at 18F employees.

EDIT: And yes, in light of that, if you are staying put, you are indeed brave and your devotion to your cause is noble.

FWIW, I laughed quite a bit too. And no, my "lack of ambition" isn't due to sleeping with my advisor's daughter, of which he has not one.

Logged back into my throwaway just to say that he made me guffaw too.

>There’s less competition for the “eccentric” — the bilingual, tech-talented, sociable, engaging entrepreneur.

>There’s less competition for the “eccentric” — the bilingual, tech-talented, sociable, engaging, white male entrepreneur.

Fixed that for the OP.

Thank you for the advice. I appreciate it.

I'm currently working through preparing for a candidacy exam, and I've found a number of errors on a Physical Review article...yes, a Physical Review. They aren't the crux of the paper, but they are fundamental equations that they apparently implemented in their code (of course, I don't have access to that code), and these updates are the crux of the paper. If the equations they wrote are wrong, how can I trust their results?

Recently a senior researcher admitted to me that from a journal he referees for, he was referee-ing for a paper and found 10 issues with it. However, the editor came back to him and told him accept it.

You're damn right it's stacked, and sometimes "long track records" just means cosy with the publisher. It's not like there isn't corruption elsewhere in the world, but young scientists do not have start-ups. They do not have opportunities or the means to go against the grain and get into those risky projects unless it's after the decade or two of getting cosy with others in the academe and building those mini-empires. You're very right they need a venue, an accelerator for grad students, I suppose.