HNHacker News
TopNewBestAskShowJobs

throwaway59511

128 karma · joined May 31, 2016

submissionscomments
throwaway59511··on Simply Hired is shutting down June 26
Because a) that is how it was represented to me, albeit with very high standards, and b) I don't feel comfortable massaging the truth like that. If and when I go into detail I can explain things that I think go in and against my favor.

Also, mathattack's answer: https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=mathattack

throwaway59511··on Simply Hired is shutting down June 26
I don't understand. What about Yahoo VPs would lead you to expect the experience I had?
throwaway59511··on Simply Hired is shutting down June 26
Crunchbase shows them having taken an A round in '04 and several times since then [1]. Their E round wasn't long before my interview there [2].

[1] https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/simply-hired#/entity

[2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11810217

throwaway59511··on Simply Hired is shutting down June 26
Throwaway to share my experience with them:

I applied in mid-2014 to a software eng position based on encouragement from a recruiter. I went to two onsites with five people in total, each of which passed me to the next round.

They had me come in for a third onsite(!) to meet with CEO James Beriker and some head of engineering. I had admitted to being let go for underperformance to the position I held two jobs ago (was doing fine at my current). I had explained this to each past interviewer who asked. Beriker just seemed to want to have fun with it, asking "well why the heck should I hire someone who's been fired?" He looked at my resume and said, "so, what were you doing between these positions ... oh right, that must have been how long it took you to find a job".

Whenever I asked for clarification on his other questions, he cryptically dismissed it with, "just, whatever you interpret that to mean".

I don't imagine that they're going to get a steady stream of good candidates[1] if they're going to put you through all that and still veto you for something they should have known very early on. I ended up working somewhere else and have gotten a total 35% raise since starting.

I also had an interviewer who did the thing where they get flabbergasted and insistent that you did it wrong because you use the opposite convention from the "official" solution, until you walk through it.

[1] In one interview, I derived the optimal solution to the Dutch Flag Problem despite not having seen the problem before.