187 karma · joined December 21, 2016
The 1% may have 50% (or more) of the money, but they only have 1% of the votes. The 99% (or rather, those members of the 99% who vote as if they're in the 1%) need to exert their power at the polling booth.
"atque in perpetuam, frater, ave atque vale"
The change is not to interview for "cultural fit" but for "values alignment".
We discovered there was a book of English translations of Catullus in the library, which we used to "help" with our homework. I'm pretty sure it didn't contain 16, because we would definitely have noticed. :p
And just to tie this back to the original topic, Leon Sterling (first author of The Art of Prolog) was the head of the Department of Computer Science at the University of Melbourne when the development of Mercury began there.
But before you do, push back against the founder. The next time he pushes directly to master, immediately revert the commit, but cherry-pick it over to a development or staging branch instead. Then notify him what you've done and why (including that you're trying to prevent breaking changes being made on master, like happened previously).
How the founder responds to this will determine whether you leave, or whether you stay a bit longer and perhaps gain the founder's trust. But still expect you'll have to leave. :/
> When working on the project, each developer runs forest dev, which mounts a virtual filesystem in the local directory using FUSE, called dev/.
> dev/ contains all of the source files, projected into the developer's syntax of choice.
Your inclusion of SQL in that list really shows you have no idea what you're talking about.
What tosh. Of course we can predict the future... and sometimes our prediction is correct.
Data compression works by modelling the data stream and predicting the next symbol based on that model, and then recording in an efficient way the degree to which the prediction was correct. The comparison between the prediction and the actual outcome is the key point -- just as it is in the article.
As more is known about the condition, the diagnostic criteria listed in the DSM could be updated, which would mean that this test would then need to be evaluated again. But that doesn't prevent its current accuracy being measured.
It's a tunnel, duh.
RMS would vehemently disagree with you: he founded the Free Software community, and has nothing to do with Open Source Software.
Just wow.
Historically, nuclear power plants take years or decades to build, and at great cost. The risk to investors is so high that they only proceed with some kind of state-funded insurance.
If there really was a modern nuclear reactor design that would compete in the energy market with wind and solar, everyone would be building them already.
Why? I suspect that climate change is a factor, but how do we know whether that's true and the CDC isn't allowed to report it, or whether it's false?
It was news when he asked questions in 2016 for the first time in 10 years: https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/02/29/468576931...