toenail

Developers shouldn't have to waste their time to figure this out.

People are still buying electronics even if their prices go down. Reality doesn't agree with the idea that inflation is necessary for consumption.

That doesn't mean the number of units in the financial system has to go up. Their value can simply go up.

Deindustrializing a country is not something consumers can achieve. It starts at the top level, with politicians who construct a financial system where it's more profitable to speculate than to build or invest in real businesses.

0%. Zero percent is the actual reserve rule. https://www.stlouisfed.org/bank-supervision/reserve-administ...

Fines escalate when there is no compliance.

And math skills are going to collapse from calculator reliance.

Greed? Resellers aren't charities, good for them if the value of their stock goes up. Besides, people buying server equipment aren't exactly starving, I bet most of them can either simply not buy the server, or cut some other expense.

It's mostly fear after Chernobyl, fueled by environmental groups and the Green party primarily.

Even worse than "a bunch of people" is when the majority behaves like that.

Interesting, kind of like a more fancy web shell. Haven't really ever seen the need for those, mostly because terminals work better than browsers.

Is wayland going to be aroud in another 10 years, or it it the new pulseaudio?

Ah yes, independent computer game producers adding copy protection were scammers.

Roughly 10% of humanity is without papers and excluded from the banking system for life, also because western coutries enforce KYC/AML rules.

The entertainment industry tried for decades to achieve artificial scarcity for profit. All scammers?

Ethereum promised smart contracts where "code is law", but rewrote the rules of their system when a bug was found in the first popular smart contract, the DAO. That's when I lost all interest in it.

I have a feeling xorg will still be there, when devs have moved on from wayland to the next new thing.

Similar articles from the past: "Bitcoin mania: when a single bitcoin was worth more than a pizza"

What's the pyramid scheme here? The Netherlands are the top producers of tulips today, seems like a sustainable business. A temporary inefficiency in markets does not make a pyramid scheme.

Makes you wonder why this wasn't always possible.. I go to lots of events that have qr codes on their tickets, this will be useful

Historical consensus? So the non scientific view? Science is not consensus based.

Fiat money is obviously more destructive, but you'd have to do some basic research to figure that out.

> Both ethical and safe conduct depend on context and intent.

That entire line of reasoning is absurd. You can get information from books, they don't know context and intent either. Books will never be ethical or safe.

I have also switched from claude to codex a few weeks ago. After deciding to let agents only do focused work I needed less context, and the work was easier to review. Then I realized codex can deliver the same quality, and it's paid through my subscription instead of per token.

Sounds like you've already made up your mind?

Sure, why should my opinion have changed?

What does that even mean? Multiple branches is a git feature.

I thought everybody does this.. having a model create anything that isn't highly focused only leads to technical debt. I have used models to create complex software, but I do architecture and code reviews, and they are very necessary.

The idea that the state should decide which way of parenting is responsible is extreme.

With this line of reasoning you can just take away any agency from individuals and put it into the hands of the state, which leads to totalitarianism.