269 karma · joined February 5, 2022
Did the LLM explain its reasoning for how it is showing the higher dimensions? Or perhaps this is a standard way of attempting to display higher dimensional space?
GPU support should really be a optional extra eg `torch[gpu]` or `torch[nvidia]`.
It opens a fuzzy finder window showing the branches you have in the repo, sorted by recency. Also shows the latest committer and the date. Hit enter on the one you want to swap to it.
Thank you for sharing!
Try it, it's llama 3.1 8B at 16000 tokens per second.
chatjimmy.ai https://taalas.com/the-path-to-ubiquitous-ai/
You would reduce the time required by the root of the number of pixels you want (assuming a square image).
(This is what we do in momentum-resolved electron energy loss spectroscopy. In that situation we have electromagnetic lenses that focus the electrons that have been dispersed, so we don't have as bad a chromatic aberration problem as the other response mentions).
I would love to see e.g. a butterfly image with a slider that I could drag to choose the wavelength shown!!
Given that regular phone cameras have sensors that detect RGB, I wonder if one could notice improved image sharpness if one had three camera lenses (and used single-color sensors) next to one another laterally, with a color filter for R, G and B for each one respectively. So that the camera could focus perfectly for each wavelength.
And do you have any prompts to share?
If you need it, use a dataframe validation library to ensure that values are within certain ranges.
There are not yet good, fast implementations of proper types in Python dataframes (or databases for that matter) that I am aware of.
And how does one compare the results in a way that is easy to parse? 7 models producing 1 PR each is one way, but it doesn’t feel very easy to compare such.
People will go "what is this?", "huh, I’m not gonna make a user for this, can’t tell what it is". Those are my 2 cents.
Thank you for a lovely post!