> the quality of service was good.
But that doesn't make it a good business. And when it's not a good business, it gets scrapped.
1,596 karma · joined August 26, 2011
But that doesn't make it a good business. And when it's not a good business, it gets scrapped.
Nope, Walmart is reportedly in talks to buy Jet.com.
> include the keywords REMOTE, INTERNS and/or VISA when the corresponding sort of candidate is welcome.
"a full ounce for 100 or less" -> 12.5 for an eight
That pretty clearly depends on the prior probability, P(M).
> Their business model depends on farmers agreeing to licensing their seeds. Nothing says that those farmers have to agree to that.
The entire concept of patents disagrees with you. If the farmers don't agree to a license, they cannot legally use the invention.
Just because some employers (and some ordinary people) might purchase it for situations where it's not the best option doesn't make the single-port MacBook "a horrible failure."
That may be true from the perspective of understanding the technical workings of the internet, but it's orthogonal to the discussion of understanding internet culture.
"Internet savvy" in this context means savvy with media and savvy with modern social networks, not with the OSI model of networking.
> When the timer runs out:
> If you voted Abandon, you will be kicked from the room. You can hit the participate button again to start from the beginning.
> If the majority voted Abandon, everyone is kicked from the room.
> If the majority voted Stay, the room is closed and a new subreddit is created, with the name of the chat room being the sub name. Up to 5 random people in the room are granted moderator permissions in this sub. It should be noted that the chat room name is a mashup of the current room users.
> If the majority voted Grow, they will be merged with another group of about the same size in a new chat room. You can vote again from there. Every time it grows, the "level" variable from earlier goes up by one.
From https://m.reddit.com/r/OutOfTheLoop/comments/4cwi9o/whats_up....
Basically it's another Reddit social experiment.
Microsoft Research has an interesting video[1] on the UX impact of different touch latencies. Even below 100ms, users are very sensitive to latency.
As technology becomes more centralized, the computing power of your phone or laptop becomes much less important than the power of Google's and Amazon's data centers. Your devices essentially become clients for computation done in the cloud.
Technological advancements generally don't require increases in the client's computing power anymore.
Generally, one shouldn't present allegations as facts (use phrases such as 'allegedly'), but doing so is standard for criminal complaints.
[1]: http://www.google.com/design/spec/animation/responsive-inter...
That's definitely not accurate, the 30-pin connector was introduced in 2003 and wasn't replaced until 2012.
> A lodging industry trade association petitioned the FCC last month for the ruling on blocking personal Wi-Fi signals.
> The petition stems from Marriott International’s agreement last month to settle an FCC investigation into a complaint that at least one of its hotels used communications-jamming technology to disable the personal Wi-Fi hotspots that many travelers tote with them.
Firstly, the ban on Wi-Fi jammers is an FCC rule, not a law.
So Marriott settled according to current rules. The hotel lobby then petitioned FCC to authorize them, and change the rules if necessary, to jam Wi-Fi. Google and Microsoft filed letters opposing this petition.