trevoragilbert

It feels bolted on to an otherwise cool thing. Even angling the board, or smudging, dimming color, localizing language, etc. All would make it feel like it fits.

What a great name for a project

This is very cool! For the name extraction, how are you handling false positives across such a large dataset? I’m assuming there are mentions that could be a name but are actually just a noun. For example, Agricola being the word for farmer but also a name.

You should research what’s inside the boxes in Oregon before just assuming they’re easier to tamper with.

As does the Long Beach Aquarium. Had a lot of fun!

This looks really nice! I'm not a bookseller so I can't speak to the value props, but it's clearly coming from a well-informed position based on your background.

The interaction is really great and I love the premise. But it seems to be missing a huge amount of information from pre-1000BC that gives the impression nothing happened/there are no people there.

I can't speak to international arrivals (though I can to the rest of the airport, it's gorgeous), but while PDX is international it only has 5 direct international flights other than Canada. Hardly going to be the focus of the airport.

Tomatoes like a fairly neutral ph of ~6.5. A better example is blueberries with mid-4’s.

Any thought on incorporating contact enrichment to really make it end-to-end?

Congrats on the launch. As someone who has dealt with early lead-gen at multiple startups, I'd say it's 50% finding the right company and 50% finding the right person at that company. Especially when there isn't already a network connection.

Whenever I read about why Agile is bad and then the inevitable comments about how "no, Agile is good, it's just [company/business people/project managers/etc.] implemented it wrong," I'm struck with the similarity of "no, Communism isn't bad it's just that no one has really done it yet."

And this is on top of it being stolen away from the rightful owners: hay farmers.

This looks very interesting. Congrats on the launch! I’m curious how you see it developing compared to an existing tool like Hex?

Follow up: sign the deal and we’ll also send you batteries.

This is fun! In trying to find an edge with generating based on a word, from what I can tell it also has a border of not-bombs which gives the player an edge they wouldn't have in classic minesweeper.

It's not a fallacy if one of the complaints is "routine practice in American politics." It's directly pointing out that it isn't routine by accident, it's routine by design from the beginning.

Historically this is just how it works. You want law x passed and I'm ambivalent about it, I want law y passed and you're ambivalent about it. We both need each other to pass either of them, so we agree to pass both as part of a larger law. This isn't a new thing and has been happening since the 1800s. As early as the decision to make DC the capital we've traded goals through compromise.

The process does get abused and I get frustration over those instance. For this one in particular, there are thematic similarities that can reasonably fall under "national security concerns".

Far less if the personalization and recommendation system isn’t included.

It doesn’t have to be owned by a US company, it just needs to not be owned by a CCP backed entity.

Why would it be to a conglomerate? It’s more likely that existing US investors raise extra money to just buy it and run it locally. Existing antitrust environment would make it extremely unlikely an existing consumer tech co will be allowed to buy it and non-consumer wouldn’t make sense.

I found myself thinking “oh wow I hope I get enough criteria to be approved” and then remembered I’m a US Citizen and do not, in fact, need to get an O1.

> we have more than enough resources and means to distribute them to everyone

I read that as giving everyone weapons and was surprised at the tone shift.

Ha, the timing makes it look like you did this in response to my comment. :D Very excited about this!

Happy Supabase user here, albeit on a tiny app I work on in my spare time. So no comment for larger or more complex orgs.

That being said, the Swift documentation could use some love. It’s not terrible but it’s also not great. There have been a number of times when I wanted to do something, ended up reading about it on the Supabase JS documentation, and then thought “well I assume it’s roughly the same in the Swift library.” It worked, but a pain to have to guess a lot.

There’s some question about that. One group claims they own his likeness and they’re litigious so no one wants to push against it.

https://amp.theguardian.com/media/2022/may/17/who-owns-einst...

You can just let it run.

Whimsy! Love it.

Looks really interesting! Would love it to support Swift, it's very underserved with other AI code assistant tools currently.

Where do you get “the most likely outcome is bankruptcy” and not say, a $5b fine and something akin to a consent decree? Totally exaggerating the likely consequences.