came for the fish, stayed for the all-too-familiar feeling of incomplete projects.
240 karma · joined July 16, 2013
came for the fish, stayed for the all-too-familiar feeling of incomplete projects.
I hate to say this, as I'm generally optimistic towards most developments like this, but over the last decade I've become so apathetic towards anything and everything from Google. They've lost so much mindshare and credibility. Their org structure leads to stagnation left, right and centre.
I'd rather tolerate the poor status quo in React land than take any sort of bet on Google getting something "newish" right.
It wasn't always like this.
to view a thread, you have to interact with a tweet. this interaction drives metrics that results in the tweet showing up more frequently in the algo-feed. the multi-post nature of a thread means there are more opportunities to "like/retweet" - which also drive the algo-feed.
all this increases follower count... and an audience (that's soon to be easily monetisable on twitter) is far more valuable than a blog... unfortunately
but by allowing JS/whatever, it gives you an infinite landscape to work with the values in a language that a wide range of people grok.
it's just a matter of getting a decent deployment setup so you can rinse and repeat easily.
but i agree, it's a freaking jack hammer where most people need a small tack hammer.
If approached in the right spirit, GDPR compliance can be a win-win for email marketers, quite possibly providing a much-needed correction.
- this is the first confirmation I've received from a company stating outright that they're not going to be GDPR compliant and you should stop using them if you need to be.
- they're explicitly saying it's too much effort to store data in a compliant manner and ensure their processors are complaint. this possibly raises some interesting questions about what exactly they're doing with the data they have today.
- this GDPR thing is like async code, once it gets into a system it has long tentacles. I don't think this company fully realises just how many companies need to be GDPR compliant to continue doing business online. if you're in the SAAS business, it's very likely you're dealing with EU customers - or at the very least a customer that deals with EU customers, or an customer of a customer that deals with EU customers. You get the point - this tentacle keeps reaching down. You may think you're not excluding many of your own customers by not being compliant because THEY aren't EU-based, but it's their customers/controllers etc that require them to be compliant and thus you.
This tentacle is all encompassing.
[edit: fix Intelligent Cloud vs Azure specifically]
By controlling the ad experience at this level (and this possibly being the only way to avoid being blocked), Google can enforce an ad-experience that is akin to in-feed facebook ads.
It also provides a far greater level of security around the ad unit and a far better level of accurate targeting (cookies don't get used, your login does). These two things together provide a new way to interact / monetise those ad units.
the sooner i can remove skype from my life the better.
that said, why can't any of these phone systems deal with the use case of two people trying to call each other and then simply auto connect the two calls? why does one side have to drop the call and answer the other?
for the majority of people, a printer that simply just works is good enough. you do not need to upgrade every year. you do not need the latest in ink technology - you want photo prints, do it properly online.
manufacturers like HP et al only introduce different printer models / cartridges / drivers etc etc to keep people upgrading.
so, what's the cost of doing this? i'd consider it a gift to humanity.
This sounds like the type of project everyone should be supporting - unless I'm missing something and there's an alternative that's more secure and optimised than ImageMagick?