tway923423

>I'll question the information merit of any rotten source.

Go ahead and question it.

Have you come up with any evidence that it's fabricated?

>But to say it doesn't matter where a leak came from, is to also say that whistleblowers are no different from foreign spies.

Well I guess we have to agree to disagree then. If a "foreign spy" reports that Dow Checmial is dumping pollution in the river, I'm gonna question Dow first, not the spy.

>IIRC they've not said anything about their cars being completely autonomous

How short have our memories become? I recall Tesla demonstrating being able to summon your car in a parking lot 3 years ago. That's driver not even in the car, let alone with hands-on-wheel.

Tesla has taken the "move fast and break things" approach to cars. That's fine, but they will step on toes in the process, and have to deal with it.

Coming Soon, like Theranos' blood test?

>convenient all of Wikileaks were damaging to the government of the USA and somehow never to the government of Russia

How about judging the information on its merits, not its source? Why does it matter one wink if you don't like the leakers?

>Why is Tesla held to a "standard" that no other vehicle manufacturers (that you "have to trust") are held to?

Because they are making claims about the state of their technology that no other vehicle manufacturers are.