612 karma · joined December 10, 2010
Definitely got me Zen Garden vibes.
While I agree a coding exercise is valuable - this is the actual problem. The way I test for that humility is by asking "tell me about a time you personally did a poor job." I then follow up by asking for a time they identified a failure of a colleague. I look to see if they're empathetical, open to being wrong, and declaring they're always trying to improve.
Here's my attempt: https://www.cssbed.com/
Feel free to add options at https://github.com/ubershmekel/cssbed
There should probably be a Nobel Prize for null findings to fix the incentive structure. But how do you grade and compare the different null findings? By effort? The ramifications of a null finding are likely more limited.
Seems like it would not solve rtkwe's concern. In their example using tuples make a node state equal (S, COUNT_OF_DAYS), (R, COUNT_OF_DAYS)? You would still need an infinite amount of nodes to represent an infinite precision integer state.
Even if it does - you can build intuitions to explain unintuitive results. Unituitive is subjective and a similar word would be "surprising". Because you can look at data to explain a surprising result - it doesn't make the initial result less surprising.
> They baldly admit that Unicode is not good for drawing Arabic
> Consider the "Base-4 fractions in Telugu" [...] any software that wants to use them properly will require some code to translate to and from numbers in the computer to Telugu sequences of those graphics.
Written language is hard to represent, encode and draw. You admit that Unicode&utf8 got 2 out of 3 right yet you call it a scam.
Your complaint is a scam and a horrible trollism.
* I find the template syntax is more sensible than react.
* It's not as total as angular. You can use just the small parts you'd like.
It's not one multiplatform app, but there's an equivalent format app on every platform.