If they fired her, it's an accurate statement.
What would she sue for?
39 karma · joined March 18, 2013
If they fired her, it's an accurate statement.
What would she sue for?
Since diamond is harder than sapphire, they would seem a better choice, but maybe there are other drawbacks.
I extend my thanks to GoPro's legal team for so efficiently delivering this information, saving us the trouble of reading a whole article ourselves or buying an inferior device.
Also, what sort of moron fires an employee because a photo of him is on the Internet?
Just put auth info in a cookie, and let the user associate it with an e-mail address later, once he actually knows he will keep using the service.
I believe "I can't be arsed to register" is one of the top reasons websites lose prospective users.
How do they compare to Webflow?
These catastrophic mistakes will only stop if a single one can easily bankrupt your company.
IPv4 multicast with IGMP and any system built on it are the most obvious, not to mention any IM software where people can set their status and have it broadcasted to all contacts.
I'm not sure anyone will bother writing the timing attack since he apparently gives out no prize.
That's also shiny and should keep its value much better (since gold requires nuclear reaction to make).
Also known as a non-issue (if you want to hide that you are using a service, you need to use a dedicated randomly generated mail address).
I mean, 8000 requests per minute on a quad-core systems is 33 request/second per core, or 100 million CPU cycles per request on a 3.3GHz CPU.
That seems enough for the web server to take a vacation in the middle of responding.
Or more precisely, they should be able to lock stuff, but doing so should automatically license all their copyrights, patents and trademarks used in the thing they locked for everyone to use for free forever in any way without limits.
If they are out to fuck the public in the ass, there's no reason the public's courts and police should assist or protect them.
Developer programs are supposed to be a loss offset by the higher amount of sales of your devices due to having more apps thanks to the developer programs.
Paypal, Stripe, 2checkout etc. process transactions for 2-5.5% fees, not 30% (of course 2-5.5% is also extortionate, but that's mostly due to the VISA/MasterCard duopoly, also very evil, and the horrible idea of credit card chargebacks).
Bandwidth is 0.10$/GB, so it would be another 1% at most for most apps, and doubling and rounding would make 15% the very maximum acceptable cut, with 5-10% a more reasonable one.
But of course most developers are themselves complicit in exploiting the userbase with obscenely pay-to-win games, trivial apps that are $1-2, in-app purchases and more, so they are basically content to share their loot with Apple in exchange for Apple's approval of their dubious practices and protection against their users' attempts to not pay.
Also, girls are lovely, sweet and cuddly, with rainbows, unicorns, pink ponies and lots of other delicious stuff like that.
And they are rare as developers, so it's awesome there's some.
Also monopoly of iOS devices, monopoly of OSes for iPhone/iPad and control of a large proportion of smartphone market share with their closed locked-in platform.
And a nice game!
But why release exclusively on a platform controlled by an evil monopolist, considering you are apparently not seeking to shear the easily-parting-with-their-cash sheep that use it?
As long as everyone follows these basic rules, and you only edit files on one system at once, it's going to be OK.
(which is pretty obvious, btw)
If not, the fine is too high.
That will fix the issues.
While we are at it, some law that forces companies to give service to everyone (no bans) and extends free speech to privately owned websites (no censorship) is also sorely needed.
Right now the level of unpunished abuse of power by service operators whose service has become a de-facto monopoly is immense.