145 karma · joined July 5, 2017
However, a site that is defined as being dedicated to controversial topics is likely to turn into a flame-fest or an echo-chamber quite fast. Do you have a proposed mechanism for preventing that?
Out of all people I know outside of HN, I'm the only person who does even one of the things I do. If I like your product and your product requires javascript, I'll whitelist you. Realistically, consider if the effort you'd be spending on this could not be spent elsewhere.
I would even go so far as to say that peer review is worthless, it may well be time to replace it with peer reproduction as a prerequisite for having an article published.
I USED to have two powerful and rather higher quality speakers attached to a creative card back in the day when I did all that with the PC though.
Edit: I reloaded right after posting the above, and the gallery loaded immediately as a result. Something's wrong with the loader.
The form factor was of the Psion great and I even ended up getting the Sony Clié NX73V more or less because of that years later... Aside from the 227g weight, it was an amazing device for ebooks with an amazing 320x480 resolution...
It's funny, I use a 6" e-ink Tolino (Shine 2HD, if I recall right) for ebooks these days, but the far lower resolution LCD displays never bothered me back then... My phone today has a considerably better and larger display (Samsung AMOLED) compared to then, and yet I would prefer not to read on that; I wonder why...
Here is my issue with WhatsApp though:
How will I know that Meta is still shipping an application based on an uncompromised version of the Signal protocol, without malicious modifications? Auditing is the normal answer.
Sadly, Meta is not ISO27001 certified, so there's no trustworthy external audit trail.
Barring that, who is capable of auditing Meta to confirm this? Who can see the client and server sources to confirm that there is no MITM? Only Meta, on both counts.
I have to trust their word for it and I'm incapable of trusting them.
Thinking, with intent to convey that thinking into words understandable by your chosen audience, involves understanding your audience in the first place. You must learn to observe your audience; this is far more important than whatever idea you may want to express; if your audience is not receptive to you, you have lost before you begin. To generalize, listen before you speak.
Once you have an idea about how you may best express your idea, you should give a thought to how you are structuring your idea. For the details, it is generally considered a good idea to read, and read a lot. It is best if you read authors who are comprehensible to you, but have a firm grasp of the kind of style you wish to cultivate in yourself. After a bit of this, you really do have to write a lot - quantity is much more important than quality when you are hoping to improve yourself.
Almost all of what I wrote above can be tied to sources, and I would have liked to add more, but unfortunately I do not have the time to find references at this point in time, or write more.
Their track record [1][2][3] does not show a positive or improving trend, so when Google asks me to take them at their word that they are not doing something that would make them more money, I cannot reconcile that with their prior behavior.
[1] https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/02/time-make-amends-googl...
[2] https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/apr/24/apple-goo...
[3] https://www.theregister.com/2021/10/22/google_facebook_antit...
In contrast to your last sentence, I believe that if you are not using your time off for recovering, then you cannot work with a good capacity.
If you find yourself unable to motivate yourself for coding in your time off, you are possibly not recovering enough as it is, so trying to get better in your time off vs. in your paid time is not necessarily a healthy thing.
You can arrive at burnout by pursuing that path long enough.