21,081 karma · joined April 27, 2021
I work on projects that would get 8-9 figure investments if we were doing this in APEC
Are the apac equivalents of those projects generating returns commensurate with the extra investment? Or is it a strategic choice that they typically focus more on advanced manufacturing while the US focuses more on software? I'm just wondering what the right way to think about this is.Also interesting is that sgitr is almost identical to "Bad Blood" by John Carreyrou (sp?) about Theranos. Most of the same elements were present in that fraud.
The usual art student tropes are more offensive because they are about people in a chosen degree being dumb (incidentally, when I did engineering all the hardcore "haha artsies are so dumb" engineers failed out after first year). That's not the same as criticizing a specific flaw in their education. If there's some big blind spot the average sociology degree leaves, that should be fair game.
At this point basically any third party booking should be considered a scam. Even if the booking company is "legit", you're still a second class citizen with the hotel or whatever you booked and subject to no help, arbitrary fees, no points, etc.
It's just as much scamming on the side of the hotels - they accept third party booking but misrepresent that they treat you the same.
I'm generally the first to jump on law enforcement for misbehavior, and I'm sure the guy that killed her will be treated way more leniently than a civilian. I think this is a little blown out of proportion though, and focusing on the interpretation of the words "limited value".
This post is mostly about plumbing. It's probably the right way to do it if it needs to be scaled. But for learning, it obscures what is essentially simple stuff going on behind the scenes.
Aren't there pr firms you can hire to help with this, and focus group and whatnot so you don't have to enrage the internet and then issue "clarifications". I'm always amazed when big companies are so bush league. Hire a consultant to help if you're not sure, they've probably lost millions in goodwill over this.
Edit: to clarify, I'm not really talking about the policy change, more the way they announced it, received all kinds of criticism, then "clarified". There may for example be a business reason why they are ok with pissing off some customers, but why not get the messaging right the first time?
Edit: I'm not trying to convince anybody, I know there's a group that's to far gone for that that really needs proper mental health support. My comment was really just a reaction to accusing the normals of "denial", which is a bit much.
This is to do with SAR limits that are based on heating. The order makes sense, it has nothing to do with "cell phones cause cancer" type nonsense.