1,771 karma · joined December 8, 2007
While not hard evidence, I think it's indicative of the kind of experience a developer has when they choose to engage with syndication.
Library Many Objects One Object
--------------------- -------------- ------------
Custom 0.0187769 0.00682402
Strainer 0.0603201 0.0337129
serpy 0.073787 0.038656
Lollipop 0.47821 0.231566
Marshmallow 1.14844 0.598486
Django REST Framework 1.94096 1.3277
kim 2.28477 1.15237
Comments on how to improve the benchmark are appreciated.source: https://voidfiles.github.io/python-serialization-benchmark/
Lark is written in python and I would argue that Lark does a better job of meeting the expectations of what an API should be like supporting POSTs, and DELETEs.
It would also fit in well with an existing flask project. It has a blueprint that you can mount.
oAuth integration is planned, I am working on it right now. I also plan on making websockets work in the same manner as flask-sockets.
If you embrace that idea, and go with the flow, you can do some amazing things amazingly fast with angular that doesn't work so well in other frameworks.
Because WordPress is built on PHP it has a wider array of deployment options, including many low-cost options, while maintaing a relatively easy to use sheen.
I think it makes sense to evolve WordPress to merge the benefits of something like octopress with WP.
For reference: http://developer.yahoo.com/blogs/ydn/posts/2007/04/rule_1_ma...
It's laudable that you are paying attention to caching, but you don't compile all your files in to one file. It seems like you could pick up a lot ground here by at least concating all css into one file, and js in to one file.
Also you could load jquery from the Google AJAX API endpoint. That way the users has a higher chance of having already loaded jQuery.
Also using the same CSS/JS products across multiple pages would help.
Seriously, food is a big deal, someone at my orientation asked a VP why we didn't get free food. She answered by explaining that the only people who liked the free food were the employees, and that share holders didn't like the free food, and that we work for the shareholders. With that everyone clapped. I remembered at the time that free food sounded good, especially because I was about the become a Yahoo employee.
So, I hope this is like the Canary in the coal mine, but in reverse.
http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2008/03/1000_true_fan...
If you think about how Twitter needs to reach 100 of millions if not billions of users to possibly become sustainable, or figure out how to squeeze more money out of the users they have. Then compare that to the App.net proposal. Especially the part about making the user the customer. Then you can see how having a small set of faithful users might be more sustainable.
Dalton wrote more about this in his post: http://daltoncaldwell.com/an-audacious-proposal
disclaimer: I work for App.net, but this post represents my own views.
When it comes to a mainstream adaptation I wonder if they will retain the diatribes. It would be really interesting to see how an audience takes to his level of engagement in a specific subject.
You should take a queue from Flickr. I took a look at how they handled this, and I think it's one the best I have seen so far.
http://dailyjs.com/2011/11/28/flickr-async/
The method there could actually be a small amount of code, and wouldn't require that you load jQuery before queuing events.