I think you maybe believing that War would not have happened or there was some other approach without war, ever? I'm sorry but such beliefs are as wishful thinking as buying the world a coke.
354 karma · joined November 13, 2013
I think you maybe believing that War would not have happened or there was some other approach without war, ever? I'm sorry but such beliefs are as wishful thinking as buying the world a coke.
Inevitably it turns into the same tired discussions that either:
A) Actually, it's not completely EU because it has x% of American parts
B) America Bad
Then, the one person who comes in to give a different opinion is met with your comment. I see it constantly.
You all need to watch actions more than what people say.
I think some of these anti-claude comments have some face, then I get a peek into how people use them, and it seems all wrong.
The tooling is incredibly configurable, but comes out of the box with a big auto button, because thats what people want. Doesn't mean advanced users have to use it.
I'll leave it up to the reader to figure out why this may be important.
"I agree that it adds little to the conversation"
Do you think those comments should be flagged and [deleted] or they add value here and should be kept around?
So every topic regarding current administration is a bad faith argument on the proponent side? Or just this one?
So why is it flagged and not debated? If all counter points are flagged, then there is no discourse. The only discourse is all the people who agree with each other.
Do I want to see more of them, probably not. Does it deserved to be flagged, absolutely not.
Sounds like authoritarianism.
2 Is a statement with a link. What is wrong with it? https://news.gallup.com/poll/652523/americans-endorse-early-...
Requiring all voters to provide photo identification at their voting place in order to vote Democrats: 67%
You will say it's not a reasonable opinion, it's hate or fear and should be downvoted/flagged, but that is incorrect and exactly what leads to echo chambers. Which is ironic because HN is usually very pro-speech/thought... or used to be.
Any/Every discussion that makes the top page on HN about politics will flood out most of the conservative discussion, further most of the comments are echo chamber 'me too, Trump fascist' that adds very little to the conversation.
Really, where exactly? I'd say 100% polar opposite. I live in a county that has voted for a R president almost every election, and the conversations are very different. There is a lot of disagreement, but it's usually the disagreement on the HOW not the WHAT.
You can't get it in high cost states like CA, NY etc...
You mean it is easy to get access to nutritious food?
Further, you keep shifting the goal posts on the discussion from
Living->Surviving->Food insecure (claiming not enough to eat)>"affordable nutritious"
Opinion: 50k/yr (outside urban areas) is enough for a family of 4 to have necessities and eat healthy, America is still the land of opportunity.
"a legal "Research Chemical" with effects similar to MDMA (Methylone/bk-MDMA)"
Someone that is quick to assume without reading could easily make this mistake.. there are my research chemicals that are not technically categorized and not MDMA.
Read about Sasha to start https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Shulgin
That escalated quickly... Are you ok?
Just my opinion.
Plenty of people stick things in their butt and go to the emergency room. So what.
The only people using these terms with regards to solar is terminally online people or people who watch 24/7 news.
Texas has more solar capacity than California, does that make Texas woke?
Did you know Texas produces more solar energy than California? https://insideclimatenews.org/news/05032026/inside-clean-ene...