1,252 karma · joined September 14, 2025
If you played a lot of parts yourself and put your effort into them, why drag those AI drums in? That's like sculpting 90% of a sculpture with your hands and then generating the remaining 10% and 3d printing them in. For what sake?
Answering your question, it diminishes nothing except your own honesty with yourself and your listeners. If you're fine with that, well, you do you.
> I do not blame the Company for getting there first. Who got there first is an irrelevant detail, a historical footnote
Oh, such a noble mathematician, he's so above the questions of moral, Truth is all that matters.
Almost as much as a paycheck from the Company.
There's a huge lot of suicidal people who ideate their afterlife as "pursuing hobbies".
They killed your comment, but you should know that you've posted it on the world's #1 AI propaganda site, where literally trillions of dollars are at stake and ROI depends on the correctness of the discourse running among the meat LLMs foraging or lurking here.
Or at least just childishly naive for failing to notice that beforehand.
Then, someone releases a pick that works for many more locks humans couldn't pick.
And says: You can't stop the progress. Now pay us to upgrade your locks (no-no, they won't be doctored to fit our next-gen picks, trust us!)
Without massive scale weapon-grade NLP coming out of AI PR depts and targeting unwitting programmers, the LLM psychosis wouldn't happen.
Someone is very interested in averting people from knowing it in detail, and most people play along self-censoring.
That's not quite practiced by those who preach "the genie is out of the bottle, and we invested too much to allow him go back, so adapt or die".
Do you realize it won't last long at such rate?
AI algorithms were developed in 1950s, and what all those vultures were waiting for was a good dataset and enough compute power, which they saw coming in advance.
The most vocal denouncers of egoism are utterly pathologic egoists themselves.