2,500 karma · joined April 4, 2014
One of the greatest achievements of YouTube is basically serving countless audiences and numerous use-cases under the guise of a single service.
You'd need to roll-up WhatsApp video sharing, Vimeo, Facebook Watch/Tik Tok/IG Reels, MTV, and then throw the aspirational element of creator payments over the top of it. I'd question whether anyone would actually want to do all of that.
Highly not recommended, but get a static IP address and open a port on your home network to the internet that points to a folder you drag to would be the most open?
I truly don't understand this, and each time I see the stats on it sit in even greater disbelief. Why would anyone turn down the opportunity to spend, for an awful lot of companies, fully paid time off work to spend time with their new family?
Guessing I'm much less "career-minded" than of lot of these guys, but it makes zero sense to me that you wouldn't stretch this benefit as far as you can do.
Edit: appreciate all the comments! Main themes are to reiterate it's not an easy task by any stretch, and fears (both real and assumed) over retaliation for time out. I'm not yet lucky enough to be father, but I still can't square either of those between work and family time.
Usually the best thing to do is to buy the worst house in the best neighbourhood. That way you are in for less cash, but are anchored to the higher prices around you.
Obviously it depends on the politics of a situation, but be wary of those questions that might arise, and still leave on good terms if the new place wants to confirm you weren't let go.
I also work for a global tech company whereby that approach isn't needed as we have our own payment processing to handle that, but as a part-time indie, I want the option of deferring to the stores for payments.
Not saying it's valuable in a world sense, but for the objectives of the machine you're working in, it often is.
Suffice to say, this crap has impact on real people, in the real world. To imply it's just some neutral action doesn't reflect the reality we live in.
Or, people now value cities more than they value having more children, leading to depopulation due to replacement rate reduction, rather than people leaving to have more children.
Sorry, but that's just not correct. It's always someone's job to clean up this mess, and that falls on individuals. If they have to clean up a stressful mess, they definitely do care. A lot.
I've had to clear up messes in the past, and it severely negatively impacts my mental health. Never, ever think that it's a victimless crime. They might not feel the force of the actual crime itself, but there are most definitely employees out there where the second-order effects on their wellbeing are starkly negative.
Again, for customers, you never know what those second-order effects of the delayed cost would be. I'm not going to whip up slippery slope arguments, but again, you're assuming that customer interactions with companies are all one-sided "I can do this later" kinds of interactions.
We shouldn't hand-wave away bad things because they only impact some faceless "company". Companies are made up of individuals, most of whom don't want to be there, but most definitely care when they're forced to do more work by some bad actor.
No, but employees and customers are, and they feel real, human costs as a result.
Just because a management team has underfunded security is not an excuse to cause pain on other people.
They're correct that a state built on communist principles would have free healthcare for all, and would have proper free education for all. However, the reality is markedly different, and all the so-called communist countries are anything but.
Will be interesting to see what (if any) knock on effect it will have in regards to other tax jurisdictions.