46 karma · joined May 10, 2019
Instead we have comments like this from the Independent:
> [Cathay Pacific] said it would comply with a directive from the Civil Aviation Administration of China (CAAC), which ban any employees who took part in the protests from working on mainland China-bound flights.
https://www.independent.co.uk/travel/news-and-advice/cathay-...
and from the BBC:
> Last week, Cathay Pacific had told its staff it would not stop them joining the pro-democracy demonstrations currently sweeping Hong Kong.
> But on Monday, Mr Hogg warned staff they could be fired if they "support or participate in illegal protests".
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-49367949
It is certainly possible this is true, but I find it troubling this story is at the top of HN without other reliable sources backing it up.
Both the individuals visiting these sites, and possibly even the people making the decision to implement tracking don't know their browsing data is being used for anything other than analytics by the website provider, (if at all by the user, who likely feels safe behind a private browser).
- stand out of our light by james williams
- the attention merchants by tim wu
- the shallows by nicholas carr
and not on the attention economy, but nervous states by william davies is very much in the similar thread.
as for being “useful”, it is not so cut and dry, which i think her philosophy wouldn’t allow. it isn’t a “do this” so much as it is an “i did this”. and for me, the subjectivity of attention is much better lent to that than some objective diagnosis of attention.
Reading this post earlier this year stopped me in my tracks and would highly recommend the book if you enjoyed this!