wbc

It ends up being a tiny portion of the game because it's hard to monetize.

The majority of the game will still be timer based buildings/armies (so you pay to speed up) and egregiously p2w pvp.

may I ask how you're mocking Celery to test?

the two main methods I've seen are to run tasks eagerly, or test the underlying function and avoid test Celery .delay/etc at all

I think falling is the prime example. All 4 of my grandparents were relatively healthy, no heart issues, mild elevated blood sugar not even pre-diabetic. Once they reached 70s/80s, all of them eventually fell while walking around, became wheelchair-bound or hospitalized and died after.

I wish we had good population metrics on this.

o wow TIL, thanks for explaining that. Scary stuff to think about

Anyone know how feasible enough to require modern (powered-everything) cars have at least 1 window that has backup manual rolling for this scenario? or is it just too rare for the increased complexity?

my understanding from the article is that they're working specifically w/ breast cancer, so probably easier w/ females

Anyone work in emissions reporting have more insight into this? Scope 3 especially seems tough

well clearly the solution is www.houseguarantee.lol

This whole thing is just so regressive. Every time I use my 2% back card, I know some less privileged folks paying cash gets shafted.

I wish everyone would use just debit cards over ccs, faster than trying to count out coins, less fees.

sure it is! it all went to fiat@, it's marked clearly in the excel spreadsheet and everything

way to figure out the efficient market hypothesis and why it could be wrong at such a young age!

This happens across many competitive games, where you can raise your Elo/MMR by playing gimmicky stuff instead of working on fundamentals. E.g. ling rush in Starcraft, 1-tricking in League, etc etc.

Sure you can score based on flexibility, but the people who work hard on staying competitive knows at heart all ratings are just an approximation anyways. Just work on fundamentals, get good, and don't sweat the numbers. Not a problem worth fixing imo.

Can you talk more about the transition? Did you start over w/ bachelors in biology? Are you taking classes online/on the side?

I'm in a very similar situation as you and want to jump into grad school, but it looks like that's not possible w/o undergraduate degree.

Good news! Mendoza province now accepts crypto for taxes:

https://cointelegraph.com/news/argentina-s-mendoza-province-...

Anyone know of promising cancer startups? Was listening to a podcast that mentioned pancreatic cancer mortality rates and it's basically a death sentence (stage 1 85%+, later 95%+)

I don't drink or smoke but would love to avoid cancers. Wife was working at a great one but it basically shutdown cause clinical trials are so expensive.

Has anyone tried this? How close is the taste to real/meat bacon?

Yeah but how's gourd production doing?

can't you just drink decaf?

those #s just the cash portion or total comp (rsu's included)?

I thought it wasn't just the sugar but the carbonated water negatively impacts digestion.

Do you ever get weird stomach aches?

these amounts (10, 50, 100, w/e) are being lent on a minute by minute basis and are paid back in a week:

https://www.kucoin.com/margin/lend/USDT

USD transaction cost might be too high if the technology doesn't exist

he declared bankruptcy

I recently found out there's a setting you can "opt out" of new design. So it reverts UI for reddit.com to old.reddit.com, and all your links/redirects work w/o having to append `old`.

way to sum up my coding career :D

There's some misunderstanding here. The paper is asserting that the volume is fraudulent, due to wash trading, not that the trades are fake.

In your toy scenario, I put 8 on the best bid, you put in 1 more, then I go on another account and hit the bid for 9 volume. 1 of that is legitimate volume, and 8 is fraudulent because I'm trading with myself (aka wash trading). Sure you get your fill, but the paper asserts that the stated volume is too high (in this case by 8).

Super unlikely, the main reason is at that point many people buy tickets and it becomes more and more likely the jackpot is split between multiple winners [0].

Actually the largest Powerball at $1.586 billion was split between 3 people [1]

[0] https://chance.amstat.org/2020/02/lottery-ticket/jackpots-ev... [1] https://apnews.com/article/archive-6d98eff765c9e2f4b68367131...

I'm confused, how does that capital flight work exactly? Say I start w/ $1 million in RMB, how does Tether factor in here?

World of Warcraft, the cash cow product, is getting content delayed according to one of the devs:

https://twitter.com/JeffAHamilton/status/1419115702569472003

This is great stuff! after working w/ various Django apps for years (anywhere from 3 dev teams to 200 dev teams), it's great to read stuff that confirms my biases :D

Regarding services, I'll go as far as to say adding ANY method on models instead of handling logic in services is a recipe for disaster. How many times have you seen:

  class GodModel:

    @property

    def status(self):

      # 1 million lines of logic and who knows how many queries

I've actually seen this pattern in every Django project :(

Regarding urls, instead of enforcing a flat file, I'd highly recommend always using django_extensions[0]. You'll get `shell_plus` that auto imports model and `show_urls` that you can grep for endpoint and gives you the handler.

[0] https://github.com/django-extensions/django-extensions

I dont think they used bots to test, just rpc endpoints, at least as of 2016 blog:

https://technology.riotgames.com/news/automated-testing-leag...